IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v170y2026ics0168851026000849.html

Paying family carers requires a fit-for-purpose instrument: Lessons from Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Gemperli, Armin

Abstract

Switzerland has recently expanded financial support for family caregiving not through a dedicated carer allowance, but by routing payments through professional home care reimbursement. Following Federal Supreme Court rulings, relatives without nursing qualifications can be paid for reimbursable nursing tasks when contracted through an authorised home care provider. Market entry by for-profit agencies, combined with fee-for-service billing and substantial municipal residual cost financing, has contributed to rapid growth in billed home care hours and has exposed monitoring and accountability gaps. The first implementation package of the Nursing Care Initiative further reduced administrative barriers by allowing nurses to initiate and bill selected services without a physician order, shifting authorisation closer to the billing entity. The Swiss case highlights a design risk relevant beyond Switzerland: using unmodified professional reimbursement mechanisms to remunerate family carers imports volume incentives and can enable rent extraction unless task definitions, tariffs, transparency, and oversight are adapted. Policy options include a distinct reimbursement pathway for lay family carers, tighter operational definitions, claim identifiers to enable monitoring, and financing levers that protect carer pay while limiting agency margins.

Suggested Citation

  • Gemperli, Armin, 2026. "Paying family carers requires a fit-for-purpose instrument: Lessons from Switzerland," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0168851026000849
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851026000849
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2026.105647?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:170:y:2026:i:c:s0168851026000849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.