IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v161y2025ics0168851025001447.html

The role of private equity in the German outpatient sector

Author

Listed:
  • Jochimsen, Beate
  • Gibis, Bernhard

Abstract

Outpatient medical care in Germany has traditionally been delivered by self-employed physicians, primarily in solo or small group practices. A 2004 reform allowed corporate private investors, to finance outpatient care for the first time. Since then, the establishment of so-called medical care centres (MCCs) has become a staple of public healthcare. From the outset, concerns have been raised that economic interests could conflict with the values of a public health system. However, there is a notable lack of empirical evidence to support this potential conflict. This study seeks to narrow the empirical gap using three methodological approaches: a scoping review, identification of relevant data sources, and a brief case study. Our findings indicate that, to date, there is no empirical evidence suggesting a decline in the quality or scope of healthcare services when MCCs are financed by private equity investors. Nonetheless, the potential emergence of oligopolistic structures and a lack of transparency in provider ownership and structure call for careful regulatory oversight. Policy recommendations include strengthening the data infrastructure with respect to medical outcomes, costs, and provider characteristics (e.g. ownership or affiliations), and safeguarding medical decision-making from profit-driven influence by owners. As rising private investment, including private-equity, in outpatient care is observed across nearly all healthcare systems, an internationally comparative approach is essential.

Suggested Citation

  • Jochimsen, Beate & Gibis, Bernhard, 2025. "The role of private equity in the German outpatient sector," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:161:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025001447
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001447
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim N. Nolte & Felix Miedaner & Sandra Sülz, 2022. "Physicians’ Perspectives Regarding Private Equity Transactions in Outpatient Health Care—A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tracey, Matthew & Schulmann, Katharine & Tille, Florian & Rice, Thomas & Mercille, Julien & Timans, Rob & Allin, Sara & Dottin, Alexis & Syrjälä, Sanna & Sotamaa, Tiia & Keskimäki, Ilmo & Rechel, Bern, 2025. "What are the policy options for regulating private equity involvement in health care? A review of policies implemented or considered in seven high-income countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:161:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025001447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.