IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v155y2025ics0168851025000442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple job holding and its influencing factors among Belgian nurses: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Vleminckx, Senne
  • Sevenans, Anke
  • Bouchatta, Manal
  • Verbeeck, Ive
  • Franck, Erik
  • Haegdorens, Filip

Abstract

Multiple job holding (MJH), historically referred to as moonlighting, is increasingly recognized among healthcare workers, yet it remains underexplored among nurses. This study investigates the prevalence and motivations for MJH among nurses in Belgium. Using a cross-sectional survey, data were collected in 924 nurses between November 2022 and March 2023. The aim was to identify key influencing factors driving nurses to consider or engage in MJH, with motivations categorized into “push” and “pull” factors. Results show that 38.3 % of nurses hold multiple jobs, with financial necessity and job dissatisfaction (push factors) as the dominant drivers. Younger nurses, men, and those without children were more likely to engage in MJH. Pull factors, such as professional growth and job autonomy, also played a role but were deemed less important. Financial insecurity, particularly the inability to live comfortably on a single income, emerged as a strong predictor of MJH. Additionally, nurses with master's degrees were more likely to take on secondary jobs, possibly due to career development motivations. Despite the growing trend of MJH, the study highlights concerns about nurses working outside their primary profession during a nursing shortage. These findings suggest a need for policy interventions to address inadequate financial compensation and improve job satisfaction within nursing roles to reduce the reliance on secondary employment.

Suggested Citation

  • Vleminckx, Senne & Sevenans, Anke & Bouchatta, Manal & Verbeeck, Ive & Franck, Erik & Haegdorens, Filip, 2025. "Multiple job holding and its influencing factors among Belgian nurses: A cross-sectional study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:155:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025000442
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000442
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:155:y:2025:i:c:s0168851025000442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.