IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v152y2025ics0168851024002495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A historical overview of policy perspectives towards informal care in Taiwan (1996-2023)

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Yu-Ching
  • Chen, Chen-Fen

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of policy perspectives towards informal care in Taiwan, focusing on the development of carer support services. It traces the transition from self-funded services by the Taiwan Association of Family Caregivers (a nonprofit organisation), to services funded by the government. Taiwan's approach highlights the considerable changes brought about by the implementation of the Long-Term Care Services Act which elevated the legal status of carers. Other reforms include the establishment of community-based carer support centres, the introduction of a carer referral mechanisms, and the decentralisation of services to local governments. Carer policies in Taiwan have increasingly embraced the perspective of carers as co-clients, not only recognising their crucial role in the care ecosystem but also raising the profile of informal care in public policy. However, ensuring sustainable funding from the central government, which is vital for the continuation and expansion of carer support, presents a considerable challenge for future policy considerations. The Taiwanese experiences of integrating carers into the long-term care policy context and of decentralisation of carer support services to local governments, serve as a reference for other countries developing carer policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Yu-Ching & Chen, Chen-Fen, 2025. "A historical overview of policy perspectives towards informal care in Taiwan (1996-2023)," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:152:y:2025:i:c:s0168851024002495
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024002495
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shand, J. & Gomes, M. & Morris, S., 2023. "The impact of having a carer on adult health and social care utilisation across five settings of care: A matched cohort study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Hsu, Hui-Chuan & Chen, Chen-Fen, 2019. "LTC 2.0: The 2017 reform of home- and community-based long-term care in Taiwan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 912-916.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Misook & Song, Hyunjong, 2020. "Disagreement between a public insurer’s recommendation and beneficiary’s choice of long-term care services in Korea," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 881-887.
    2. Cutler, Henry & Gu, Yuanyuan & Bilgrami, Anam & Partington, Andrew, 2023. "The 2021 proposal to increase market forces in the Australian residential aged-care sector," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 60-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:152:y:2025:i:c:s0168851024002495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.