IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Improving the productivity of elective surgery through a new ‘package of care’

Listed author(s):
  • Ashton, Toni
  • Bramley, Dale
  • Armstrong, Delwyn
Registered author(s):

    In response to a need to improve the productivity and throughput of elective surgical services, one district health board (DHB) in New Zealand has introduced a ‘package of care’ (POC) in which incentive-based, risk-sharing contracts were developed collaboratively between DHB managers, surgeons and anaesthetists. The POC includes throughput targets and facilitates consistent surgical teams and the cohorting of patients. Whilst many staff are very supportive of the POC, some are of the view that it conflicts with the ideals and principles of working in a public health system, and creates inequities amongst the hospital staff. Analysis indicates that, after controlling for age, casemix and complexity the POC has resulted in shorter theatre times, shorter lengths of stay and lower average inpatient event costs compared with standard care at the public hospital. An unintended consequence could be that the POC may encourage throughput of less complex cases at the expense of more complex cases. The average complexity and range of cases performed publicly should be carefully monitored to ensure this does not occur.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Health Policy.

    Volume (Year): 108 (2012)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 45-48

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:108:y:2012:i:1:p:45-48
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.007
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:108:y:2012:i:1:p:45-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    or ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.