IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/glofin/v69y2026ics1044028326000050.html

Are machines better predictors of insider trading?

Author

Listed:
  • Batebi, Solmaz
  • Elnahas, Ahmed

Abstract

This study examines whether machine learning (ML) techniques can improve the prediction of insider trading behaviour compared with traditional linear approaches. Using a comprehensive sample of U.S. insider trading data from 2000 to 2022, we compare ensemble learning methods—random forest and extreme gradient boosting—to logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). We implement Bayesian hyperparameter optimisation to improve model tuning and employ Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values to maintain interpretability and identify the principal economic determinants of insider trading decisions. Additionally, we apply Gaussian Thompson sampling to evaluate competing hypotheses about insiders' market-timing motives. The results demonstrate that ML methods substantially outperform linear models in predicting both the likelihood and magnitude of insider sales, with predictive gains particularly pronounced among female insiders. SHAP analysis indicates that incentive structures play a stronger role for male insiders, whereas female trading behaviour appears more closely associated with private information about future firm performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Batebi, Solmaz & Elnahas, Ahmed, 2026. "Are machines better predictors of insider trading?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:69:y:2026:i:c:s1044028326000050
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2026.101237
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028326000050
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.gfj.2026.101237?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:69:y:2026:i:c:s1044028326000050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620162 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.