IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/glofin/v67y2025ics1044028325000900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do voting powers matter in equity finance? Evidence from chinese private placements

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Peiyuan

Abstract

In prevailing theories of capital structure, the role of voting power is often neglected. However, voting mechanisms are critical in financing decisions, as shareholders typically place high value on maintaining control, and voting power is central to that control. This study introduces a financing theory that posits companies are more likely to pursue equity financing when incoming shareholders are unable to challenge the voting power of incumbent shareholders. The theory suggests that in certain ownership structures, newly entering large shareholders cannot meaningfully influence voting outcomes, prompting existing shareholders to favor equity financing. In contrast, when ownership structures allow new shareholders to significantly affect voting results, firms tend to prefer internal or debt financing. To evaluate this theory, the study conducts an empirical analysis using data from Chinese listed companies. The findings support the model's predictions and further reveal that this effect also impacts firm growth and dividend policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Peiyuan, 2025. "How do voting powers matter in equity finance? Evidence from chinese private placements," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:67:y:2025:i:c:s1044028325000900
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044028325000900
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.gfj.2025.101163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:glofin:v:67:y:2025:i:c:s1044028325000900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620162 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.