Author
Listed:
- Wilmsen, Carl
- Hajjar, Reem
- Sandoval, Gerard F.
- Huber-Stearns, Heidi
- Downey, Jess
- Davis, Emily Jane
Abstract
Studies of labor markets in forestry have consistently found that white workers tend to fill better-paying, higher-quality jobs than workers of color. Such segmentation of labor markets is well documented in other industries and has been theorized as a general feature of racial capitalism. Although it is widely recognized that racial capitalism marginalizes entrepreneurs of color, scholarship on racial capitalism has generally focused on the precarity of workers. We interviewed workers, business owners, and forestry professionals in southern Oregon and northern California to investigate how political and economic structures shape income equity, contracting opportunities, and career mobility among workers and contractors in the forestry services industry. We found that there were not only segmented labor markets, but also a racially segmented contracting market. In what we call the “duality of exploitation,” Latino employers were placed in the position of being simultaneously the exploited and the expropriators. Immigration policy in the 1980s enabled many undocumented forest workers to gain legal status and become forestry contractors. Through barriers in federal contracting, these employers are themselves exploited while simultaneously expropriating surplus value from their vulnerable immigrant and viséed employees. Our findings elaborate existing theorizations of racial capitalism by suggesting that state policies and practices produce subject positions in which the differential distribution of power and resources fosters the exploitation of marginalized workers by similarly marginalized employers.
Suggested Citation
Wilmsen, Carl & Hajjar, Reem & Sandoval, Gerard F. & Huber-Stearns, Heidi & Downey, Jess & Davis, Emily Jane, 2026.
"Racial capitalism and the duality of exploitation in forest labor contracting,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:189:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126001528
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103847
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:189:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126001528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.