IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v189y2026ics1389934126001371.html

Film screenings in the forest: insights from audience feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Robinson, James Scott
  • Nnyiti, Petro Paul
  • Mustafa, Kassim

Abstract

Studies combining filmmaking, screenings and audience research to explore the social dimensions of forested landscapes are rare. This paper reflects on an experimental methodological approach involving the production and screenings of a documentary film, Cattle in the Community Forest, about the politics and discourses surrounding livestock encroachment into reserves under community-based forest management in south-eastern Tanzania. This approach was designed as a form of ‘member-check’ with combined methodological and ethical purposes. Ethically, it aimed to enhance participants' active involvement and foster mutual respect by sharing findings accessibly and by providing an opportunity to feedback. Methodologically, feedback screenings intended to improve research depth and credibility through participants' validation, questioning, challenge and elaboration. To investigate the extent to which this approach achieved these goals, we analyse viewer responses from twelve screenings with stakeholders including farmers, pastoralists, agro-pastoralists, village leaders and government officials. As a research tool, feedback screenings added depth to findings by illuminating divergent participant interests, inter- and intra-group relationships and politics. Polarised reactions highlighted the approach's ethical complexity. Most viewers, particularly those not in positions of authority, responded positively to the documentary because they felt it benefited them in various ways. However, some in positions of authority challenged the film because it did not serve their interests. Other critical responses highlighted flaws in our research process. By providing an open and honest account of this experimental approach, the paper aims to aid researchers employing member-check by making and sharing films, particularly when injustices and/or conflict related to forest landscapes are central.

Suggested Citation

  • Robinson, James Scott & Nnyiti, Petro Paul & Mustafa, Kassim, 2026. "Film screenings in the forest: insights from audience feedback," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:189:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126001371
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934126001371
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:189:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126001371. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.