IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v189y2026ics1389934126001358.html

Stakeholders' perception about forest fires in the Alpine region

Author

Listed:
  • Hoang, The Trung
  • Vilà-Vilardell, Lena
  • Müller, Mortimer M.
  • Vacchiano, Giorgio
  • Pezzatti, Gianni Boris
  • Dupire, Sylvain
  • Schunk, Christian
  • Vacik, Harald

Abstract

Climate change has increased wildfire pressure in the European Alps, yet a common understanding of fire regimes and coordinated fire management strategies remains lacking. This study analyzes the perceptions of three stakeholder groups in Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Slovenia, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland. An online survey and a forest fire workshop for experts were conducted to obtain different perceptions regarding the key factors and trends of the current and future fire regime. Our analysis indicates that there are significant differences between the groups regarding the perception of the number of fires, burnt areas, and future trends. Stakeholders identified precipitation, temperature, and wind as the main natural drivers of the fire regime, while recreational activities, rural abandonment, and owner awareness were identified as the main socio-economic drivers. These findings advance our understanding of the complex systems shaping future fire regimes in the European Alps and provide decision-makers with tools to design effective integrated fire management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoang, The Trung & Vilà-Vilardell, Lena & Müller, Mortimer M. & Vacchiano, Giorgio & Pezzatti, Gianni Boris & Dupire, Sylvain & Schunk, Christian & Vacik, Harald, 2026. "Stakeholders' perception about forest fires in the Alpine region," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:189:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126001358
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934126001358
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:189:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126001358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.