Author
Listed:
- Grubbström, Ann
- Powell, Stina
- Holmgren, Sara
Abstract
This study explores the thoughts of forestry students at upper secondary school about future working life, as well as their hopes and concerns related to the phase-out of intensive forest management practices. How students relate to forest is seen as central to understanding the emotions that shape their view of the future. The concept of transition pain is used to analyse feelings such as resistance and perceived unfairness. The study is based on seven focus groups involving 35 Swedish forestry students. Findings reveal that students see forests as crucial for their well-being and social lives. Students' caring relationship with forest is challenged by the high rate of production in forestry and they express concern about how this may contribute to personal stress and soil damage. Students express transition pain by discussing how different forest management methods could change the appearance of the forest and thereby their ability to engage in forest-related activities. They also raise concerns that phasing out intensive forestry management practices might create challenges for the industry and affect their future job opportunities. At the same time, they express hope in the growing environmental awareness and convey their own willingness to contribute to the transformation of forestry. The study suggests that the emotional dimension needs to be included in discussions of professional socialisation and that forestry education has a vital role in creating space for reflections, to help students navigate ambivalence and critically assess different forest management approaches. Such reflections may also contribute to a capacity to drive change.
Suggested Citation
Grubbström, Ann & Powell, Stina & Holmgren, Sara, 2026.
"Willingness to change and transition pain - exploring forestry students’ views on future forestry,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:188:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126001127
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103807
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:188:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126001127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.