Author
Listed:
- Johnston, Craig
- Guo, Jinggang
- Prestemon, Jeffrey P.
Abstract
U.S. softwood lumber demand is intrinsically linked to residential construction. However, most previous studies have not adequately accounted for this key demand driver when projecting lumber demand. This study links projected housing activity under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) to softwood lumber demand by explicitly incorporating housing starts into the Forest Resource Outlook Model (FOROM). To support this integration, we first estimate updated demand elasticities using quarterly U.S. data from 2000 to 2024 within an instrumental variables framework. Results show that housing starts are the dominant driver of demand (elasticity 0.59), while the income elasticity declines to 0.14—well below previous estimates—and price elasticity remains inelastic at −0.21. These empirically grounded elasticities are then embedded in FOROM, allowing SSP-consistent housing projections to directly shape long-term market outcomes. The revised specification improves alignment with recent historical data and produces more credible projections. Across SSP scenarios, U.S. softwood lumber demand declines by 2070, though outcomes differ significantly: SSP5 yields the highest consumption, while SSP3 produces the lowest. Regional impacts are uneven, with the U.S. South experiencing the largest contractions and the Pacific Coast showing greater resilience. By explicitly linking housing projections to forest sector modeling, this study demonstrates that incorporating construction activity is critical for translating socioeconomic scenarios into accurate timber market outcomes, with important implications for policy, investment, and resource planning.
Suggested Citation
Johnston, Craig & Guo, Jinggang & Prestemon, Jeffrey P., 2026.
"Revisiting U.S. softwood lumber demand projections: The central role of residential construction in forest sector outlooks,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:187:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000870
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103782
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:187:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.