Author
Abstract
Boreal and temperate forests have been greatly affected by clear-cutting. Alternative management systems, such as continuous cover forestry and selective logging, have remained secondary to the dominant even-aged management regime. This regime has its roots in scientific forest management, whose dissemination and development have been well described. But the experiences of rural communities living in the landscapes affected by this large transformation have received less attention. Drawing on archival material from the 1960's in southern rural Sweden, the purpose of the current study is to understand how the introduction of the scientific forest management ideal was perceived and explained among rural residents. Based on a landscape of power-framework, I analyse rural resistance to and accommodation of the new forest management regime. Over the covered period from 1850's to the 1960's, the respondents describe a change in how forests were valued. This change was a result of the dominating views on forests as part of Swedish nation building, of industrial development, and land reforms. Through the introduction of advisory services, educational activities, and new regulations, certain types of forest use were promoted. The study contributes by showing rich insights into how the practices of scientific forestry were contested yet accommodated. This gives context to the roles of power and values in paving the way for the model of rotation forestry to become hegemonic. This may, in turn, contribute to understanding what hinders and enables current alternative policy pathways.
Suggested Citation
Ekström Pigot, Hanna, 2026.
"Now the forests are of value an everyday historical political ecology from southern Sweden,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000833
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103778
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.