Author
Listed:
- Guo, Jinggang
- Johnston, Craig
- Prestemon, Jeffrey P.
Abstract
International forest product statistics contain measurement errors, missing values, and trade flow discrepancies. Our study presents a recursive dynamic goal programming approach to identify and reconcile these inconsistencies over the period from 2000 to 2022. Unlike traditional static reconciliation methods, this framework includes year-over-year consistency, optimizing deviations between reported and estimated values while adhering to technological constraints and trade balances. Results indicate substantial regional heterogeneity: Europe and North America exhibit high reported–reconciled agreement, while Oceania and Africa require larger adjustments. Export statistics consistently require the greatest corrections, with import–export reconciliation gaps often reaching 20–30 percentage points. Agreement rates vary widely across products, with residues (waste paper, chips and particles) requiring substantially more adjustment than other categories. The reconciled dataset reveals diverging trends in wood processing efficiency, characterized by gains in Europe and Asia contrasted against declining efficiency in South American sawnwood production. The reconciled price series captures major market dynamics, including the 2021–2022 pandemic-induced surge. Validation confirms elimination of all material balance violations present in raw data. This methodology improves resource potential evaluation and provides a robust, internally consistent foundation for future forest sector analysis.
Suggested Citation
Guo, Jinggang & Johnston, Craig & Prestemon, Jeffrey P., 2026.
"Reconciling forest product statistics for enhanced sector modeling: A recursive dynamic goal programming approach,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000808
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103775
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.