Author
Listed:
- Gutiérrez-Crocco, Francisca
- Matamala, Pablo
Abstract
This article analyses the effects of corporate environmental strategies on industrial forestry workers and their implications for a Just Transition. Drawing on a qualitative case study of a leading forestry company in Chile, the analysis combines a review of corporate sustainability reports with semi-structured interviews with trade union leaders and key informants. The findings show that corporate sustainability strategies have been primarily centred on technological upgrading and voluntary certification. While these measures have favoured some improvements in occupational safety, they have also intensified managerial control, contributed to job displacement, work intensification and shifted environmental responsibilities onto workers. At the same time, workers and their representatives have been largely excluded from decision-making processes, resulting in low levels of procedural justice. The article further shows that forestry unions display a condition of “union perplexity”, characterised by environmental awareness combined with limited capacity to influence corporate strategies. These findings underline the need for forest policy frameworks that incorporate labour relations and social dialogue as core dimensions of sustainable forest management, and for more empirically grounded, context-sensitive research on green transitions in the Global South, where labour protections and institutional support are often weaker. More broadly, the article argues that placing workers at the centre of forest governance debates is essential for advancing socially just and environmentally sustainable transitions.
Suggested Citation
Gutiérrez-Crocco, Francisca & Matamala, Pablo, 2026.
"Forestry workers in Chile: Agents of change or collateral damage in the green transition?,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s138993412600064x
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103759
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s138993412600064x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.