Author
Listed:
- Ma, Chenglin
- Meng, Xueqi
- Liu, Yulu
- Huang, Jianhong
- Zhang, Chu
- Feng, Jiajia
Abstract
In the context of increasingly frequent extreme weather events and escalating geopolitical conflicts, the timber supply chain is confronted with growing systemic risks. This study develops a comprehensive resilience evaluation framework for timber supply chains across five dimensions: resource production base, supply and distribution capacity, risk resistance capability, economic environment support, and industrial organization efficiency. This resilience indicator aims to quantify the supply chain system's ability to maintain core functions, absorb shocks, and recover rapidly when facing external disturbances. This study evaluates the dynamic evolution and regional disparities of China's timber supply chain resilience between 2013 and 2022, through constructing a comprehensive evaluation system and applying spatial analysis methods. The results reveal that national resilience exhibits three discernible cycles of growth and decline, driven alternately by policy adjustments and external shocks, while multidimensional coordination efficiency shows a marked decline. A four-tier gradient structure emerged—Eastern China leading, Northeast China declining, Central China stabilizing, and Western China lagging—where interprovincial interactions further reinforced regional disparities. Spatial clustering produced distinct patterns: “East-hot, West-cold; coastal-strong, inland-weak.” This study offers a scientific basis for regional collaborative governance and differentiated policy design in timber supply chains, thereby contributing to the optimization of China's national timber security system.
Suggested Citation
Ma, Chenglin & Meng, Xueqi & Liu, Yulu & Huang, Jianhong & Zhang, Chu & Feng, Jiajia, 2026.
"Dynamic evolution and regional disparities in the resilience of China's timber supply chain,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000614
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103756
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:186:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.