IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v185y2026ics1389934126000456.html

Addressing (in)formality: The perspective of baobab entrepreneurs

Author

Listed:
  • Dumenu, William Kwadwo
  • Mbwele, Gift Gabriel
  • Darr, Dietrich

Abstract

Despite decades of efforts, informality remains widespread in emerging markets and developing economies, partly due to continued reliance on macro-level, one-size-fits-all approaches to (in)formality that fail to account for its heterogeneous nature, context-specificity, and the perspectives of entrepreneurs. This paper adopts micro-level, context-sensitive approach to examine the determinants of firm informality and potential policy measures, drawing on the perspectives of entrepreneurs in Malawi's highly informal baobab industry, an important forest-product value chain. Using Q methodology, a mixed-method approach suited to assess subjective viewpoints, we identify five perceived drivers of informality: high cost of formality, uncertainty about formalisation benefits, weak regulatory enforcement, livelihood insecurity (survival imperatives), and low economic development. Policy measures perceived to address (in)formality include reducing the cost of formality, improving awareness of the perceived value of formalisation, enhancing human capital, increasing employment opportunities, and providing targeted incentives for formalisation. The findings demonstrate that entrepreneurs' behaviour toward (in)formality is shaped by interconnected micro and macro level perceptual, administrative, and structural factors. Addressing (in)formality effectively requires a multidimensional, multilevel approach that is sensitive to contextual realities and grounded in entrepreneurs' lived experiences.

Suggested Citation

  • Dumenu, William Kwadwo & Mbwele, Gift Gabriel & Darr, Dietrich, 2026. "Addressing (in)formality: The perspective of baobab entrepreneurs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000456
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934126000456
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.