IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v185y2026ics1389934126000328.html

Public acceptance of policies to reduce forest loss: Evidence from a large-N cross-national survey in East Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Hepelwa, Aloyce
  • Babyenda, Peter
  • Ndwiga, Michael
  • Ntiyakunze, Matilda
  • Okumu, Boscow
  • Teklewold, Hailemariam
  • Stage, Jesper
  • Slunge, Daniel

Abstract

While environmental policy acceptance has been extensively studied in OECD contexts, comparative evidence on how different forest policy instruments are perceived across low- and middle-income countries remains limited, particularly regarding the interaction between individual attitudes and national governance conditions. This study addresses this gap by analyzing stated support of four policies aimed at reducing forest loss across five East African countries: Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Uganda. Using survey data from 4542 respondents, we examine individual and contextual factors associated with acceptance.

Suggested Citation

  • Hepelwa, Aloyce & Babyenda, Peter & Ndwiga, Michael & Ntiyakunze, Matilda & Okumu, Boscow & Teklewold, Hailemariam & Stage, Jesper & Slunge, Daniel, 2026. "Public acceptance of policies to reduce forest loss: Evidence from a large-N cross-national survey in East Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000328
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934126000328
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2026.103727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:185:y:2026:i:c:s1389934126000328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.