Author
Listed:
- Sanyal, Kritishnu
- Dasgupta, Shyamasree
Abstract
This study on perception analysis uses a multivariate ordinal probit regression (MVOR) model to analyse the factors influencing the perception of village communities towards forest ecosystem services (FES) in Himachal Pradesh, India. It contributes to the scholarship in two ways: first, by demonstrating the application of the MVOR to identify factors shaping perception within an ordinal framework, and second, by exploring the drivers that involve communities in sustainable forest management outside the market framework. Results show the community recognises the importance of provisioning services the most (median rank =4) and regulating and supporting services the least (median ranks = 2). The highest ranging threshold values (0–2.46) for supporting services indicate that this FES is a grey area, unlike regulating service with thresholds ranging between 0 and 1.2. Formal education significantly (p < 0.05) tends to help the community appreciate the intangible benefits of FES. This suggests that the school curriculum should incorporate a comprehensive framework of ecosystem services, while also allowing for more specific discussions on local topics to promote greater awareness of the values of regulating and supporting services among local communities. The study also emphasises empowering local bodies to strengthen community agency with more meaningful participation of educated youth. It advocates for a shift in forest management policies from a punitive to a reward-based approach, helping communities recognise the value of conservation. The preference for FES is not significantly influenced by economic needs (p > 0.05), suggesting that conservation rewards should consider broader benefits that extend beyond financial.
Suggested Citation
Sanyal, Kritishnu & Dasgupta, Shyamasree, 2025.
"How village communities perceive the relevance of forest ecosystem services: Insights from Himachal Pradesh, India,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001972
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103618
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.