IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v179y2025ics1389934125001893.html

Public perceptions of climate and land use drivers of medicinal plant availability in Czech forests: A national survey-based study

Author

Listed:
  • Awuni, Stephen
  • Hájek, Miroslav
  • Riedl, Marcel
  • Huertas-Bernal, Diana Carolina
  • Purwestri, Ratna Chrismiari
  • Ibrahim, Forzia
  • Dudik, Roman
  • Jumpah, Emmanuel Tetteh
  • Adarkwah, Francis

Abstract

Medicinal plants are vital to forest ecosystem services, contributing to biodiversity, public health, and rural livelihoods. In the Czech Republic, the perceived availability of these resources is increasingly threatened by climate change and land use change. This study explores key environmental drivers perceived by the public to affect the availability of medicinal plants and examines forest owners' adoption of management strategies to sustain these resources. Based on a national perception-based survey of 1500 respondents, including 53 forest owners, regression and descriptive statistical methods were employed to examine reported environmental drivers and management strategies. The findings reveal that climate change and excessive chemical use are widely perceived as major stressors associated with the reduced availability of medicinal plants. However, only 45 % of surveyed forest owners reported adopting formal management strategies, leaving substantial forest areas at risk from environmental pressures perceived to threaten medicinal plant resources. Among those implementing measures, forest restoration, organic agriculture, landscape protection, and pest control were the most implemented. Broader conservation schemes such as Natura 2000 were underutilised. These perception-based insights highlight the need for targeted policy interventions, including financial incentives, technical support, and education, to enhance forest owners' implementation of sustainable practices and support the long-term conservation of medicinal plant resources in Czech forests. Engaging the general public through education and participatory conservation efforts is also essential, given their key role in shaping demand and supporting forest protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Awuni, Stephen & Hájek, Miroslav & Riedl, Marcel & Huertas-Bernal, Diana Carolina & Purwestri, Ratna Chrismiari & Ibrahim, Forzia & Dudik, Roman & Jumpah, Emmanuel Tetteh & Adarkwah, Francis, 2025. "Public perceptions of climate and land use drivers of medicinal plant availability in Czech forests: A national survey-based study," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001893
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001893
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Mooi & Marko Sarstedt & Irma Mooi-Reci, 2018. "Regression Analysis," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Market Research, chapter 7, pages 215-263, Springer.
    2. Muhammad Ibrahim Shah & Shujaat Abbas & Aminat Olayinka Olohunlana & Avik Sinha, 2023. "The impacts of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services: An empirical investigation from highly fragile countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1384-1400, June.
    3. Janová, Jitka & Hampel, David & Kadlec, Jiří & Vrška, Tomáš, 2022. "Motivations behind the forest managers’ decision making about mixed forests in the Czech Republic," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Daněk, Jan & Blättler, Linda & Leventon, Julia & Vačkářová, Davina, 2023. "Beyond nature conservation? Perceived benefits and role of the ecosystem services framework in protected landscape areas in the Czech Republic," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Rupert Seidl & Dominik Thom & Markus Kautz & Dario Martin-Benito & Mikko Peltoniemi & Giorgio Vacchiano & Jan Wild & Davide Ascoli & Michal Petr & Juha Honkaniemi & Manfred J. Lexer & Volodymyr Trotsi, 2017. "Forest disturbances under climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 395-402, June.
    6. Millner, Antony & Olivier, Helene, 2016. "Beliefs, politics, and environmental policy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67299, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Antony Millner & Hélène Ollivier, 2016. "Beliefs, Politics, and Environmental Policy," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 226-244.
    8. Balest, Jessica & Hrib, Michal & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Paletto, Alessandro, 2018. "The formulation of the National Forest Programme in the Czech Republic: A qualitative survey," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 16-21.
    9. Ivan Suchara & Julie Sucharová & Marie Holá, 2021. "Changes in selected physico-chemical properties of floodplain soils in three different land-use types after flooding," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(2), pages 99-109.
    10. Erik Mooi & Marko Sarstedt & Irma Mooi-Reci, 2018. "Descriptive Statistics," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Market Research, chapter 5, pages 95-152, Springer.
    11. Gustavo Naumann & Carmelo Cammalleri & Lorenzo Mentaschi & Luc Feyen, 2021. "Increased economic drought impacts in Europe with anthropogenic warming," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(6), pages 485-491, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefano Carattini & Andrea Baranzini & Philippe Thalmann & Frédéric Varone & Frank Vöhringer, 2017. "Green Taxes in a Post-Paris World: Are Millions of Nays Inevitable?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(1), pages 97-128, September.
    2. Michael Peneder & Spyros Arvanitis & Christian Rammer & Tobias Stucki & Martin Wörter, 2022. "Policy instruments and self-reported impacts of the adoption of energy saving technologies in the DACH region," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 369-404, May.
    3. Douenne, Thomas & Fabre, Adrien, 2020. "French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Sandra Rousseau & Nick Deschacht, 2020. "Public Awareness of Nature and the Environment During the COVID-19 Crisis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1149-1159, August.
    5. Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella & Thisse, Jacques-François, "undated". "Is Environmentalism the Right Strategy to Decarbonize the World?," 2030 Agenda 308106, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    6. Yingni Guo, 2021. "Information transmission and voting," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(3), pages 835-868, October.
    7. Graham Beattie & Yi Han & Andrea La Nauze, 2019. "Conservation Spillovers: The Effect of Rooftop Solar on Climate Change Beliefs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(3), pages 1425-1451, November.
    8. Allison Benson & Juan José Rojas & Juan Felipe Ortiz-Riomalo, 2025. "Changing by Talking: An Experimental Analysis of How Structured Interventions Around Inequality can Change our Beliefs and Behaviors," Documentos CEDE 2025-38, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    9. Leiter, Debra & Murr, Andreas & Rascón Ramírez, Ericka & Stegmaier, Mary, 2018. "Social networks and citizen election forecasting: The more friends the better," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 235-248.
    10. Nikinmaa, Laura & de Koning, Johannes H.C. & Derks, Jakob & Grabska-Szwagrzyk, Ewa & Konczal, Agata A. & Lindner, Marcus & Socha, Jarosław & Muys, Bart, 2024. "The priorities in managing forest disturbances to enhance forest resilience: A comparison of a literature analysis and perceptions of forest professionals," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Drews, Stefan & Savin, Ivan & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2022. "Biased perceptions of other people's attitudes to carbon taxation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    12. Beata Zofia Filipiak & Dorota Wyszkowska, 2022. "Determinants of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in European Union Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Jan Eichhorn & Julian Thomet & Andrea Gimeno Solaz, 2025. "School is not enough: The role of climate-specific knowledge for transformative climate policy and economic system preferences," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 15(2), pages 355-387, June.
    14. Makrickiene, Ekaterina & Brukas, Vilis & Živojinović, Ivana & Dobšinská, Zuzana, 2025. "Three decades of forest policy studies in the countries in the former socialist countries of Europe: A review," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    15. Spyros Arvanitis & Michael Peneder & Christian Rammer & Tobias Stucki & Martin Wörter, 2016. "Competitiveness and ecological impacts of green energy technologies: firm-level evidence for the DACH region," KOF Working papers 16-420, KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich.
    16. Mireille Chiroleu‐Assouline & Thomas P. Lyon, 2020. "Merchants of doubt: Corporate political action when NGO credibility is uncertain," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 439-461, April.
    17. Slavec, Ana & Hoeben, Annechien D. & Moreno-Torres, Miguel & Primožič, Lea & Stern, Tobias, 2023. "When intentions do not matter: Climate change mitigation and adaptation innovations in the Forest-based sector," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Hallberg-Sramek, Isabella & Nordström, Eva-Maria & Priebe, Janina & Reimerson, Elsa & Mårald, Erland & Nordin, Annika, 2023. "Combining scientific and local knowledge improves evaluating future scenarios of forest ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    19. Carlos Sanz-Lazaro, 2019. "A Framework to Advance the Understanding of the Ecological Effects of Extreme Climate Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    20. Zhang, Le & Jiao, Liang & Xue, Ruhong & Zhang, Peng & Yuan, Xin & Li, Qian & Zhang, Kuan, 2025. "Altitude differences in relationship between radial growth process and cambial phenology of Qinghai spruce (Picea crassifolia) on the Tibetan Plateau," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 504(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001893. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.