IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v178y2025ics1389934125001662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the potential of the ‘typical forest enterprise approach’ for research in forest economics and application in policy making: A comparative analysis based on five national case studies

Author

Listed:
  • Rosenkranz, Lydia
  • Peters, Mario
  • Sekot, Walter
  • Leppänen, Jussi
  • Šinko, Milan
  • Schueler, Silvio
  • Seintsch, Björn

Abstract

Small-scale private forest enterprises (SSPFEs) play an important role in the forest sector in many EU member states. However, unlike large-scale or publicly-owned forest enterprises, they are often not included in statistical surveys. This results in a lack of elementary basic economic data on wood production on SSPFEs, which is a prerequisite for effective policy implementation and impact assessment across the EU. To address this data gap, this pilot study examines the potential application of a modified “Typical Enterprise Approach” (TEA) to forestry for the first time for SSPFE in Austria, Finland, Germany, Slovenia, and Sweden. In the TEA, models of enterprises are constructed, reflecting the typical conditions and management practices in a specific region or country. For our study, extensive literature research and expert interviews were selected to identify typical companies and depict their wood production system with key performance indicators. Our findings show, that despite sharing EU membership and common political and legal frameworks, data availability, typical enterprise characterization and cost and revenue structures vary across the five countries. Notwithstanding further need of refinement, the TEA has the potential to serve as a key source for understanding different wood production systems and for providing socio-economic key figures. By providing comprehensive and consistent data from typical enterprises, a refined TEA can help to estimate the geographical variation, identify best practices and contribute to enhancing the sustainability of SSPFEs. Therefore, a permanent establishment of an international TEA network in forestry would be highly beneficial.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosenkranz, Lydia & Peters, Mario & Sekot, Walter & Leppänen, Jussi & Šinko, Milan & Schueler, Silvio & Seintsch, Björn, 2025. "Assessing the potential of the ‘typical forest enterprise approach’ for research in forest economics and application in policy making: A comparative analysis based on five national case studies," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:178:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001662
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103587
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001662
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103587?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:178:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.