IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v177y2025ics1389934125001078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What does the climate crisis mean for forest work science? Urgent call for reviewing of research priorities

Author

Listed:
  • Lewark, Siegfried
  • Karmann, Marion

Abstract

Inclement weather conditions are threatening human health and life in many parts of the world. In particular heat and cold are dangerous working conditions for outdoor work and thus objects of forest work science. Corresponding research has been done, but to a limited extent. An exacerbation of the weather-related threats has been observed, as part of the climate crisis. What does this mean for activities of forest work science? Forest work science has an obligation of support of forestry practice and help improve adequate interventions. A forest work scientist has to deal with this question, like a scientist in any other field of science, and to act accordingly. This touches his or her self-understanding. A survey of related publications shows that there is general knowledge. But there is not much research directed to the impact of climate crisis on working conditions in forest work, while studies are published for work outside forestry. There is a need for applied research that must also consider implementation of available knowledge, e.g. by certification. Integrating the findings of surrounding fields of science, from occupational medicine to rural sociology, is called for. In general, research priorities of forest work science must be reviewed and adapted.

Suggested Citation

  • Lewark, Siegfried & Karmann, Marion, 2025. "What does the climate crisis mean for forest work science? Urgent call for reviewing of research priorities," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001078
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001078
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.