Author
Listed:
- Rodrigo, Chamali
- Joshi, Omkar
- Poudyal, Neelam C.
- Russell, Aaron
- Susaeta, Andres
Abstract
Cross-Timbers (CT) forests, located in a transition ecoregion between eastern forests and western grasslands of the southern Great Plains of the United States, provide numerous ecosystem services to the residents of Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas. Growing climate variability, decades of fire suppression, woody plant encroachment, anthropogenic activities, and notable lack of active management have altered the original composition of these forests. As most CT forestlands are privately owned, understanding the factors influencing landowners' willingness to implement active forest management is very important. This study investigated landowner preferences regarding thinning and prescribed burning, which are two key forest management practices –– through a mixed-mode survey of forestland owners in the CT region. Results suggested that landowners' willingness to adopt thinning is significantly influenced by the age of forest landowners, forest land holding size, and status of encroachment by woody plants. Similarly, landowners' willingness to adopt prescribed burning is significantly influenced by forest land holding size, status of encroachment by woody plants, education level, and non-timber ownership objectives such as wildlife habitat management, recreational hunting and fishing, and land investment. These findings are useful to stakeholders in identifying likely or unlikely adaptors of these management practices, initiating or tailoring educational programs, Extension and outreach strategies to relevant audience, and adopting policies that can promote sustainable management of CT forests.
Suggested Citation
Rodrigo, Chamali & Joshi, Omkar & Poudyal, Neelam C. & Russell, Aaron & Susaeta, Andres, 2025.
"Landowner willingness to adopt active management practices in the Cross-Timbers forests in USA,"
Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001017
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103522
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.