IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v177y2025ics1389934125000784.html

The legacy of fortress approaches to conservation: Impact of early-life experiences on contemporary natural resource use in Giant Panda Nature reserves, China

Author

Listed:
  • Duan, Wei
  • Jiang, Yicheng
  • Hogarth, Nicholas J.
  • Gao, Lan
  • Ouyang, Bo

Abstract

The natural resource utilization behavior of rural households adjacent to nature reserves (NRs) critically determines the success of biodiversity conservation efforts. However, the enduring impacts of households' early experiences with NR establishment—particularly exposure to abrupt “fortress conservation” policies—on their subsequent resource use, and how these effects vary across generations based on their age during exposure, remain understudied in the scientific literature. This study addresses this gap by investigating how generational exposure to NR establishment shapes contemporary resource use heterogeneity. Based on surveys of 449 rural households conducted in 17 NRs across Sichuan and Shaanxi provinces, China, this study used the double hurdle model to estimate the empirical model. The results reveal striking generational disparities: household heads who were adults or adolescents during NR establishment exhibit significantly higher natural resource extraction intensity compared to those who were infants/children at the time. Mechanistic analysis showed that adults/adolescents exposed to fortress conservation develop persistent negative attitudes toward NR management and maintain weaker linkages with NR authorities. By demonstrating how historical policy shocks create path-dependent behaviors through generational memory, this study challenges static models of resource use. It underscores the urgency of adopting inclusive policies to reduce the contradiction between conservation and development.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan, Wei & Jiang, Yicheng & Hogarth, Nicholas J. & Gao, Lan & Ouyang, Bo, 2025. "The legacy of fortress approaches to conservation: Impact of early-life experiences on contemporary natural resource use in Giant Panda Nature reserves, China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000784
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000784
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103499?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Yaxin & Shen, Jinyu & Hogarth, Nicholas J. & Hou, Yilei & Duan, Wei, 2021. "Impact of Nature Reserves on Human Well-being – Evidence from Giant Panda Reserves in China," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 36(1-2), pages 79-101, February.
    2. Wang, Yiru & Shi, Ting & Zang, Wenbin, 2024. "Does early-life famine exposure lead to healthy later-life dietary behavior: Evidence from the great Chinese famine," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    3. Walker, Sarah & Alix-García, Jennifer & Bartlett, Anne & Calder, Alice, 2025. "Land tenure security and deforestation: Evidence from a framed field experiment in Uganda," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Gary S. Becker, 1992. "Habits, Addictions, and Traditions," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(3), pages 327-345, August.
    5. Wei Duan & Nicholas J. Hogarth & Yicheng Jiang & Qian Chen, 2022. "How do Forest Owners’ Risk Preferences Affect Harvesting Decisions? A Case-study in Fujian Province, China," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 37(3), pages 259-293, July.
    6. Ssekajja, Godfreyb, 2024. "Inherent Dilemma: Balancing conservation efficiency and social equity in natural resource governance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    7. Cragg, John G, 1971. "Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 39(5), pages 829-844, September.
    8. Shen, Jinyu & Zhang, Yijing & Zhou, Wei & Song, Zhenjiang & Duan, Wei, 2022. "Dynamics and determinants of household's non-timber forest products collection in the giant panda nature reserves of China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Ben Ma & Zheng Zhao & Huimin Ding & Yali Wen, 2018. "Household costs and benefits of biodiversity conservation: case study of Sichuan giant panda reserves in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1665-1686, August.
    10. Jianguo Liu & Jared Diamond, 2005. "China's environment in a globalizing world," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7046), pages 1179-1186, June.
    11. Duan, Wei & Hogarth, Nicholas J. & Shen, Jinyu, 2021. "Impacts of Protected Areas on Income Inequality: Evidence from the Giant Panda Biosphere Reserves in Sichuan Province, China," Journal of Forest Economics, now publishers, vol. 36(1-2), pages 27-51, February.
    12. Zhang, Yijing & Zhang, Duxun & Shen, Jinyu & Duan, Wei, 2025. "Spatial effects of ecological cognition on firewood collection by households in protected areas: An analysis based on the giant panda nature reserves," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    13. Ben Ma & Yali Wen, 2019. "Community Participation and Preferences Regarding Conservation and Development Policies in China’s Giant Panda Nature Reserves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Ma, Ben & Cai, Zhen & Zheng, Jie & Wen, Yali, 2019. "Conservation, ecotourism, poverty, and income inequality – A case study of nature reserves in Qinling, China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 236-244.
    15. Mohammadi, Zohreh & Kašpar, Jan & Tahri, Meryem & Sherstiuk, Maryna, 2024. "Assessing citizens' willingness for participatory forest management planning: A case study in the Czech Republic," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    16. Häyrinen, Liina & Kaseva, Janne & Pouta, Eija, 2025. "Finnish forest owners' intentions to participate in cooperative forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Deng, Xin & Xu, Dingde & Zeng, Miao & Qi, Yanbin, 2019. "Does early-life famine experience impact rural land transfer? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 58-67.
    18. Baranovskis, Ģirts & Nikodemus, Oļģerts & Elferts, Didzis & Brūmelis, Guntis & Līviņa, Agita & Mežgaile, Anda, 2025. "Biodiversity conservation in private forests: Preferences of Latvian forest owners in the context of involuntary conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Bietenbeck, Jan & Sunde, Uwe & Thiemann, Petra, 2025. "Recession experiences during early adulthood shape prosocial attitudes later in life," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    20. Savari, Moslem & Khaleghi, Bagher, 2025. "Promoting safe and pro-environmental behaviors for sustainable forest management: Integrating technology acceptance model and the norm activation model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ben Ma & Yuqian Zhang & Yilei Hou & Yali Wen, 2020. "Do Protected Areas Matter? A Systematic Review of the Social and Ecological Impacts of the Establishment of Protected Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Huang, Xin & Li, Zhiyi, 2025. "Hunger for money: Early-life hunger experiences increase individual's desire for money," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Zhang, Yuqi & Vanclay, Frank & Hanna, Philippe, 2025. "How communities and social impacts are considered in policies for protected areas in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Ben Ma & Yali Wen, 2019. "Community Participation and Preferences Regarding Conservation and Development Policies in China’s Giant Panda Nature Reserves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Ma, Ben & Zhang, Yuqian & Huang, Yuan & Wen, Yali, 2020. "Socioeconomic and ecological direct and spillover effects of China's giant panda nature reserves," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    6. Marcén, Miriam & Molina, José Alberto & Morales, Marina, 2018. "The effect of culture on the fertility decisions of immigrant women in the United States," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 15-28.
    7. Fanghella, Valeria & Ibanez, Lisette & Thøgersen, John, 2025. "What you don't know, can't hurt you: Avoiding donation requests for environmental causes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    8. Langyintuo, Augustine S. & Mungoma, Catherine, 2008. "The effect of household wealth on the adoption of improved maize varieties in Zambia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 550-559, December.
    9. Dorotic, Matilda & Verhoef, Peter C. & Fok, Dennis & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2014. "Reward redemption effects in a loyalty program when customers choose how much and when to redeem," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 339-355.
    10. Bradfield, Tracy & Butler, Robert & Dillon, Emma J. & Hennessy, Thia & Loughrey, Jason, 2023. "The impact of long-term land leases on farm investment: Evidence from the Irish dairy sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    11. Ronelle Burger & Canh Thien Dang & Trudy Owens, 2017. "Better performing NGOs do report more accurately: Evidence from investigating Ugandan NGO financial accounts," Discussion Papers 2017-10, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    12. Niclas Hagelin, 2003. "Why firms hedge with currency derivatives: an examination of transaction and translation exposure," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 55-69.
    13. Subir K. Chakrabarti & Srikant Devaraj & Pankaj C. Patel, 2021. "Minimum wage and restaurant hygiene violations: Evidence from Seattle," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 85-99, January.
    14. Mastulah Kawala & Theodora Shuwu Hyuha & Ekere William & Peter Walekwa & Gabriel Elepu & Sloans Chimatiro Kalumba, 2018. "Determinants for Choice of Fish Market Channels: The Case of Busia (Uganda/Kenya) Border," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(8), pages 118-118, July.
    15. Jaiswal, Sreeja & Balietti, Anca & Schäffer, Daniel, 2023. "Environmental Protection and Labor Market Composition," Working Papers 0736, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    16. Schleich, Joachim & Alsheimer, Sven, 2024. "The relationship between willingness to pay and carbon footprint knowledge: Are individuals willing to pay more to offset their carbon footprint if they learn about its size and distance to the 1.5 °C," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    17. Fang, Feifan & Zhao, Yinyu & Xi, Zemiao & Han, Xinru & Zhu, Yuchun, 2023. "The impact of famine experience on middle-aged and elderly individuals’ food consumption: Evidence from China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 26(C).
    18. repec:osf:socarx:jnexr_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Frank Crowley & John Eakins & Declan Jordan, 2012. "Participation,Expenditure and Regressivity in the Irish Lottery:Evidence from Irish Household Budget Survey 2004/2005," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 43(2), pages 199-225.
    20. Helen Jensen & Justo Manrique, 1998. "Demand for food commodities by income groups in Indonesia," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 491-501.
    21. Torres, Marcelo de O. & Felthoven, Ronald G., 2014. "Productivity growth and product choice in catch share fisheries: The case of Alaska pollock," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 280-289.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:177:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.