IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v176y2025ics1389934125000899.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The potential of participatory citizen science for assessing ecosystem services in support of multi-level decision-making – Insights from Switzerland

Author

Listed:
  • Trummer, Johanna
  • Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee

Abstract

The importance of forests for the provision of ecosystem services is uncontested. Monitoring these services' availability is a key process to discuss sustainability, planning and management measures and provide information for decision-making at different policy levels. Particularly forests close to or in urban areas are predominately intensively used by various stakeholder groups, who benefit from the provided services. The development of an assessment tool to track the ecosystems' key variables would help to secure the sustainable provision of most ecosystem services according to the needs of the local users, improve the data basis for decision-making processes and allow comparisons between different forests. Recreational forest visitors could support the data collection process through, e.g., citizen science approaches. Thus, this study aims to investigate how citizen science has been applied to assess forest ecosystem services so far and based on this information, collect professionals' opinions and attitudes regarding society's participative integration in ecosystem services' assessment and monitoring. To reach these research objectives, an exploratory literature review (53 documents for final analysis) and eighteen semi-structured interviews with practitioners from different fields, e.g., nature conservation and education, were conducted. This research reveals that society's active integration in forest ecosystem services' assessment and monitoring would foster the transition to more sustainable and healthier forests and ecosystem services and raise society's awareness of the importance and maintenance of forests. Additionally, this would create a data basis for decision-making on regional planning and policy levels that represents and combines opinions and voices of experts and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Trummer, Johanna & Wilkes-Allemann, Jerylee, 2025. "The potential of participatory citizen science for assessing ecosystem services in support of multi-level decision-making – Insights from Switzerland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000899
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125000899
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:176:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125000899. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.