IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v12y2010i4p308-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential for biofuel development in Tihvin and Boksitogorsk districts of the Leningrad region -- The analysis of energy wood supply systems and costs

Author

Listed:
  • Goltsev, Vadim
  • Ilavský, Ján
  • Gerasimov, Yuri
  • Karjalainen, Timo

Abstract

The existing and potential energy wood supply systems have been compared in terms of cost efficiency in Tihvin and Boksitogorsk districts of the Leningrad region to find optimal supply systems. In most cases the supply systems based on the cut-to-length method have the highest cost efficiency and provides costs of energy wood between 18.8 and 25.8Â [euro]Â m-Â 3. For commercial thinnings the supply systems with manual felling are the most cost effective. In final fellings bigger average stem volume allows more productive use of harvesters that provides lower costs than systems with manual cutting. The total supply cost of energy wood from thinnings is higher compared to final fellings. Costs of energy wood cannot compete with the local price of coal and natural gas. However, energy wood is cheaper than heavy oil if transporting distances are shorter than 50Â km. Main reasons for high supply costs of energy wood are low productivity of felling, hauling and transportation. Cost efficiency of energy wood supply can be improved through learning process and the use of modern machines.

Suggested Citation

  • Goltsev, Vadim & Ilavský, Ján & Gerasimov, Yuri & Karjalainen, Timo, 2010. "Potential for biofuel development in Tihvin and Boksitogorsk districts of the Leningrad region -- The analysis of energy wood supply systems and costs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 308-316, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:4:p:308-316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(09)00189-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:4:p:308-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.