IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/fambus/v16y2025i3s1877858525000117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on family offices: What is the way forward? A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Hayoz, Patrik
  • Ge, Bingbing
  • De Massis, Alfredo

Abstract

Despite the growing presence of family offices (FOs) in practice, research on FOs is still in its infancy. Through a systematic literature review (SLR) of 104 papers, we synthesize existing knowledge in the field by integrating insights from both academic and practitioner research. Our SLR provides a state-of-the-art understanding of FOs and identifies new avenues for research that combine theoretical insights with practical implications. Specifically, our research addresses three key questions: i) How has research on FOs evolved; ii) What do we know about FOs, and iii) How can researchers further contribute to the field? We find that current research focuses primarily on FOs as service providers, with limited attention to the perspective of families as need originators. By bridging academic and practitioner-oriented research, we propose a novel definition of FOs to advance the discourse in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Hayoz, Patrik & Ge, Bingbing & De Massis, Alfredo, 2025. "Research on family offices: What is the way forward? A systematic literature review," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:fambus:v:16:y:2025:i:3:s1877858525000117
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jfbs.2025.100670
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877858525000117
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jfbs.2025.100670?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:fambus:v:16:y:2025:i:3:s1877858525000117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/719791/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.