IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v89y2021ics014971892100104x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the integration of strategic priorities within a complex research-for-development funding program

Author

Listed:
  • Bleecker, Leah
  • Sauveplane-Stirling, Victoria
  • Di Ruggiero, Erica
  • Sellen, Daniel

Abstract

This paper examines the application of Complexity Theory constructs to a research-for-development program evaluation and presents an overview of the implications and promising approaches for evaluating complex programs. We discuss lessons learned from an evaluation completed for the International Development Research Centre’s Food, Environment and Health (FEH) program, which investigated the integration and outcomes of five strategic program priorities: partnerships, southern leadership, gender and equity, scale, and environmental sustainability. We present interpretations from a secondary, thematic content analysis that categorized evaluation findings across four complexity constructs: emergence, unpredictability, contradiction and self-organization. Viewing the evaluation through these constructs surfaced some important features of the FEH program to date, specifically its evolving approach, adaptiveness to emergent issues, non-linear outcomes, and self-organizing agents, which had several implications for the evaluative process. We conclude that the most appropriate evaluation designs for complex funding programs are participatory (to explore all stakeholders' influence), adaptive (to capture the unexpected) and assess external contexts. The application of complexity constructs may be useful for evaluators to gain a deeper understanding of how program contexts change in the face of complexity and why some evaluation methods work more effectively than others.

Suggested Citation

  • Bleecker, Leah & Sauveplane-Stirling, Victoria & Di Ruggiero, Erica & Sellen, Daniel, 2021. "Evaluating the integration of strategic priorities within a complex research-for-development funding program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:89:y:2021:i:c:s014971892100104x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892100104X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. S.T, Pavan Kumar & Lahiri, Biswajit, 2023. "Conditional selection of multifactor evidence for the levels of anaemia among women of reproductive age group," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:89:y:2021:i:c:s014971892100104x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.