IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v73y2019icp187-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of a classroom movement integration training delivered in a low socioeconomic school district

Author

Listed:
  • Stewart, Gregory
  • Webster, Collin A.
  • Weaver, R. Glenn
  • Stodden, David F.
  • Brian, Ali
  • Egan, Cate A.
  • Michael, Robert Dan
  • Sacko, Ryan
  • Patey, Matthew

Abstract

Movement integration (MI), which involves infusing physical activity (PA) into general education classrooms, is an evidence-based strategy within whole-of-school approaches for helping children meet the national PA guideline of at least 60 min per day. This study evaluated an MI training delivered in a low socioeconomic elementary school that had recently invested in three movement facilitative classrooms (a kinesthetic classroom and two activity labs). We investigated (a) the training’s fidelity in meeting recommended best practices for professional development and (b) school professionals’ perspectives of the training. Eight school professionals participated in the study, including five classroom teachers, two activity lab supervisors, and the principal. The researchers used a video of the training to rate the fidelity of the training to best practice recommendations. Interviews, field notes, and informal conversations with participants were qualitatively analyzed for themes. The training received a total fidelity score of 42%. Qualitative findings highlighted participants’ varied perspectives of the training’s purpose, challenges associated with the training and future recommendations for MI trainings. For MI trainings to be a valuable asset in increasing teachers’ value and effective implementation of MI, trainings need to be designed to be in line with best practice recommendations and teachers’ perceived needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Stewart, Gregory & Webster, Collin A. & Weaver, R. Glenn & Stodden, David F. & Brian, Ali & Egan, Cate A. & Michael, Robert Dan & Sacko, Ryan & Patey, Matthew, 2019. "Evaluation of a classroom movement integration training delivered in a low socioeconomic school district," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 187-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:73:y:2019:i:c:p:187-194
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.12.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718918302404
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.12.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mazur, Rebecca & Woodland, Rebecca H., 2017. "Evaluation of a cross-cultural training program for Pakistani educators: Lessons learned and implications for program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 25-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maarja Kalma & Katrin Mägi & Evelin Mäestu & Kerli Mooses & Merike Kull, 2022. "Design Process and Implementation of Teacher Training Modules in Movement Integration: What Have We Learnt?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:73:y:2019:i:c:p:187-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.