IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Evolutionary drift in systems of care development

Listed author(s):
  • Rotto, Knute
  • McIntyre, Janet
Registered author(s):

    While we agree that it is necessary to articulate a "clearly specified population" for the definition of systems of care, we believe that limiting systems of care to "children and youth with serious emotional disturbance and their families" is not in the best interest of most communities. Using this narrow population definition excludes the other 80-90% of the youth who have mental health challenges but have not risen to the highest level of need. If all children and their families receive the right amount of support from the system of care at the right time, they will avoid the need for more intensive and expensive services and supports later. This public health approach helps to build more stable communities and redirects scarce resources to interventions that are less costly than those needed for youth who already have developed serious emotional disturbances. The key to successfully supplying the "right amount at the right time" is to ensure that the system of care is truly needs driven, rather than agency or service system driven. A system of care for children, youth and their families should reflect community preferences and embrace a public health approach where all levels of need are served.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Evaluation and Program Planning.

    Volume (Year): 33 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 1 (February)
    Pages: 21-23

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:1:p:21-23
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:33:y:2010:i:1:p:21-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.