IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v117y2026ics0149718926000261.html

From needs to dreams: An aspiration-based community needs assessment methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Kirk, Chris Michael
  • Slobodzian, Emmett
  • Yoo, Ethan M.
  • Valli, Mark

Abstract

Community needs assessments are widely utilized tools that have been mandated by key regulatory bodies and legislation for many U.S. organizations. As the name implies, these practices typically focus on what is wrong with communities in order to ameliorate those problems. Even when assets are included in reports, deficits are usually emphasized in quantitative terms. This paper presents a novel methodology for conducting community assessments that centers on community-defined aspirations rather than externally-identified needs. Utilizing a mixed-methods, grounded theory design, the protocol reverses the standard practice by initiating inquiry with qualitative exploration of community aspirations before using quantitative data to validate and specify identified themes. The methodology was tested within a regional social service agency through an iterative process involving surveys and focus groups with program participants as well as staff, donors, and community partners. The results suggest potential benefits to this methodology including the strength of aspiration-based inquiry, the value of iterative approaches, and the ability to create a theoretical model of community functioning. Limitations and suggestions for future practice as discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kirk, Chris Michael & Slobodzian, Emmett & Yoo, Ethan M. & Valli, Mark, 2026. "From needs to dreams: An aspiration-based community needs assessment methodology," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:117:y:2026:i:c:s0149718926000261
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718926000261
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:117:y:2026:i:c:s0149718926000261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.