Author
Listed:
- Meekers, Dominique
- Olutola, Olaniyi
- Abu Turk, Lynn
- Aremu, Tolulope
Abstract
This paper measures the effect of a radio jingle campaign promoting a family planning call center in Nigeria on the number of information requests received. Campaign effect is measured using comparative interrupted time series. Without the radio campaign, the number of calls from the intervention group is assumed to have been parallel to that observed in the control group. The campaign effect is estimated as the difference between the actual and projected number of calls received. Before the campaign, the monthly number of calls was stagnant, averaging below 500 calls per month. The campaign increased the monthly number of calls increased by about 360. However, this effect was temporary, which minimal gain after the campaign ended. Discussion: The comparative interrupted time series show that the radio campaigns substantially increased the demand for family planning information from the call center. However, there is no solid evidence that the radio jingle campaign had a longer-term effect on use of the call center after the radio broadcasts ended. Although short-term effects could be important if they benefited disadvantaged groups that cannot easily be reached through other means, we recommend that future campaigns be re-designed to facilitate permanent increases in call center use. Key lessons learned include that traditional mass media campaigns may not suffice to achieve widespread use of phone-based health services, that it is important to consider alternative strategies to promote the services, and that analyses of routine data (e.g., the monthly number of clients), can be invaluable for assessing their impact.
Suggested Citation
Meekers, Dominique & Olutola, Olaniyi & Abu Turk, Lynn & Aremu, Tolulope, 2026.
"Using radio jingles to promote use of a family planning call center: A comparative interrupted time series analysis,"
Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:116:y:2026:i:c:s0149718926000108
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102760
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:116:y:2026:i:c:s0149718926000108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.