Author
Listed:
- Mitiku, Fikadu
- Bekele, Adugna Eneyew
- Azmeraw, Beressa
- Mulugeta, Amdemichael
- Tiruneh, Gardachew
- Abafita, Jemal
- Millar, Elizabeth
- Barden-O’Fallon, Janine
Abstract
The population, health, environment and development (PHED) approach has been recognized for providing a more holistic and synergetic approach to program implementation than the single-sector approach. However, evidence is still needed to support the theory that multi-sectoral integration is more effective than a siloed approach. In this study, we applied the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework for midline evaluation of an integrated health, livelihood, agriculture and conservation program in Southwest Oromia, Ethiopia that specifically targeted women and youth. The data were collected through key informant interviews (KIIs), focus group discussions (FGDs) and most significant change (MSC). The findings show that the project successfully reached target beneficiaries with livelihood interventions, such as through village saving and loan associations, which were seen as important hubs for linkages to other sectors and services. Regular communication, coordination and alignment of goals with local government stakeholders supported successful program implementation, adoption and sustainability of the multi-sectoral approach. The findings highlighted the need for strategies to enhance women’s and youth’s participation, and to increase government ownership to ensure sustainability. Additionally, we found the RE-AIM framework to be flexible and adaptable for application in a qualitative PHED program evaluation.
Suggested Citation
Mitiku, Fikadu & Bekele, Adugna Eneyew & Azmeraw, Beressa & Mulugeta, Amdemichael & Tiruneh, Gardachew & Abafita, Jemal & Millar, Elizabeth & Barden-O’Fallon, Janine, 2026.
"Midline qualitative evaluation of an integrated health, livelihood, agriculture, and conservation program: Application of the RE-AIM framework,"
Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:116:y:2026:i:c:s0149718926000029
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2026.102752
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:116:y:2026:i:c:s0149718926000029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.