IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v114y2026ics0149718925001867.html

Predictive factors for inter-agency partnership success

Author

Listed:
  • Drago, Nicola
  • Vardanega, Tullio

Abstract

Building partnerships among development cooperation agencies strengthens their collective capacity. However, 2 partnerships out of 10 fail to achieve their intended objectives. Ex-ante evaluation of future partnerships should help attain a higher rate of success. To do this, agencies need a better understanding of the factors behind successful or unsuccessful partnerships. This paper draws from the first stage of a research project aimed at systematically identifying and classifying such factors by importance in a semi-automated manner, to streamline partnership planning and evaluation tasks. The principal result we report here is a dataset containing 750 factors of influence, visualized along three axes: operations and country context, governance and management, and project quality, and grouped into ten clusters. Evaluators and planners can readily use the factors and complete method to focus multi-stakeholder discussions and information gathering, as well as to learn to use Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning approaches on project design and evaluation document corpora. Future research can overcome the limitations of the method by standardizing the factor set through ontological and taxonomic work, as well as incorporating automated context and behavioral analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Drago, Nicola & Vardanega, Tullio, 2026. "Predictive factors for inter-agency partnership success," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s0149718925001867
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001867
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102719?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Madeleine W. McNamara & Katrina Miller-Stevens & John C. Morris, 2020. "Exploring the Determinants of Collaboration Failure," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 49-59, January.
    2. Walton, Mat, 2014. "Applying complexity theory: A review to inform evaluation design," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 119-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. McGill, Elizabeth & Er, Vanessa & Penney, Tarra & Egan, Matt & White, Martin & Meier, Petra & Whitehead, Margaret & Lock, Karen & Anderson de Cuevas, Rachel & Smith, Richard & Savona, Natalie & Rutter, 2021. "Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: A research methods review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    2. Sarah Chapman & Adiilah Boodhoo & Carren Duffy & Suki Goodman & Maria Michalopoulou, 2023. "Theory of Change in Complex Research for Development Programmes: Challenges and Solutions from the Global Challenges Research Fund," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(2), pages 298-322, April.
    3. Anna Matheson, 2020. "Health Inequality as a Large-Scale Outcome of Complex Social Systems: Lessons for Action on the Sustainable Development Goals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Wilma E. Waterlander & Angie Luna Pinzon & Arnoud Verhoeff & Karen den Hertog & Teatske Altenburg & Coosje Dijkstra & Jutka Halberstadt & Roel Hermans & Carry Renders & Jacob Seidell & Amika Singh & M, 2020. "A System Dynamics and Participatory Action Research Approach to Promote Healthy Living and a Healthy Weight among 10–14-Year-Old Adolescents in Amsterdam: The LIKE Programme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Pelucha, Martin & Kveton, Viktor & Potluka, Oto, 2019. "Using mixed method approach in measuring effects of training in firms: Case study of the European Social Fund support," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 146-155.
    6. Gates, Emily F., 2016. "Making sense of the emerging conversation in evaluation about systems thinking and complexity science," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 62-73.
    7. Young, Jesse D. & Belval, Erin & Gannon, Benjamin & Wei, Yu & O'Connor, Christopher & Dunn, Christopher & Pietruszka, Bradley M. & Calkin, David & Thompson, Matthew, 2024. "The cost of operational complexity: A causal assessment of pre-fire mitigation and wildfire suppression," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Michael Walton, 2023. "Adaptive Evaluation: A Complexity-Based Approach to Systematic Learning for Innovation and Scaling in Development," CID Working Papers 428, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    9. Lorthios-Guilledroit, Agathe & Richard, Lucie & Filiatrault, Johanne, 2018. "Factors associated with the implementation of community-based peer-led health promotion programs: A scoping review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 19-33.
    10. Moore, Travis & Bakken, Lori L. & Wallace, Bakari, 2019. "The importance of systems thinking, context, and inclusion when studying the feasibility of expanding the FoodShare (SNAP) outreach program to rural communities of Northern Wisconsin," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 10-17.
    11. Wei Sun & Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov & Ho Young Shin & Wei Ping Li, 2021. "Using extended complexity theory to test SMEs’ adoption of Blockchain-based loan system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s0149718925001867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.