Author
Listed:
- Ashworth, Madison
- Johnson, David
- Thompson, Robin A.
- Clancy, Grace L.
- Baier, Jennah
- Spielman, Jean
Abstract
As substance use disorder continues to impact millions of Americans, various recovery support treatment and service modalities are being developed, evaluated, and refined for effectiveness. Recovery housing provides substance-free living environments for individuals in recovery and can offer a variety of services and structured programs for residents. One such program that has the potential to enhance resident outcomes is the Self-Management and Recovery Training (SMART) Successful Life Skills program (SLS), a 12-session curriculum that uses a mix of behavioral tools and aspects of the social model of recovery employed by standard mutual aid groups. In this paper, we discuss the implementation barriers and facilitators of a 3-year initiative that aimed to implement SLS in 100 rural recovery houses across the U.S. During this initiative, the study team faced significant barriers in recruitment and program implementation. Recruitment barriers included the unknown landscape of recovery housing, stigma and mistrust in research, inconsistent staffing models, and differing treatment philosophies. Further, access to technology, technical literacy, time constraints for both residents and recovery house staff, and staff turnover created a difficult environment to successfully implement and evaluate the impact of the SLS program. Numerous solutions were employed to overcome implementation and recruitment barriers in recovery housing such as multiple contact methods, collaboration, stakeholder engagement, financial/material support, evaluation flexibility and adaptability, and transparency.
Suggested Citation
Ashworth, Madison & Johnson, David & Thompson, Robin A. & Clancy, Grace L. & Baier, Jennah & Spielman, Jean, 2026.
"Barriers and facilitators to recovery support interventions in US Rural Recovery Houses: Implementing the SMART life skills program,"
Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s0149718925001843
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102717
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s0149718925001843. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.