IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v114y2026ics014971892500179x.html

Implementing statewide literacy and special education training in the U.S.: A mixed-methods evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Reed, Deborah K.
  • Gibbs, Anna S.
  • Owens, Julie K.

Abstract

To address gaps in the field’s knowledge about implementing educator preparation program (EPP) reforms at scale, this mixed methods study gathered data from one U.S. state’s instructors to understand their perceptions of and experiences complying with new legislation and implementing state-provided training modules for future K-5 literacy and special education teachers and leaders. Across the state’s 40 EPPs, 188 survey responses and 24 focus group participants’ comments were gathered. Instructors generally agreed with the policy goals and appreciated the evidence base of the module content. However, they recommended improving student engagement and providing more implementation guidance and tools. Overall, the data suggested there was a lack of systematic implementation planning that potentially hampered reform efforts. Lessons learned about implementing policies at scale are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Reed, Deborah K. & Gibbs, Anna S. & Owens, Julie K., 2026. "Implementing statewide literacy and special education training in the U.S.: A mixed-methods evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s014971892500179x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500179X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:114:y:2026:i:c:s014971892500179x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.