IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v113y2025ics0149718925001624.html

A participatory systems approach in community health promotion: Lessons learnt from an overall evaluation of a program to reduce health inequities

Author

Listed:
  • Wagemakers, Annemarie
  • Elkhuizen, Samantha
  • Bindels, Anner
  • Wachter, Marte
  • Niewold, Dagmar
  • Derkzen, Marthe
  • Thompson, Kristina

Abstract

To address the complexity and multi-level dynamics in health promotion, participatory and systems approaches have recently gained attention. We combined these into a participatory systems approach, which actively involves stakeholders in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of health promotion initiatives. This approach promotes cross-sector collaboration, shared understanding, joint decision-making, empowerment, and acknowledges the dynamic, interconnected factors that influence health over time. However, practical guidance on how to implement and evaluate such complex programs remains limited, particularly on aligning implementation and evaluation. We applied a participatory systems approach to the planning and implementation of an overall evaluation of a program aimed at enhancing the health of families in vulnerable positions in the Netherlands, with the goal of sharing lessons learnt from this process. From the program, four projects in four municipalities were selected for this study. We studied the processes and results of the overall evaluation in four iterative steps: conducting participatory action research with the four projects, semi-structured interviews with the four case managers, three consortium reflection and learning sessions and document analysis. We identified five themes: flexibility; research and practice needs; research capacity; roles of stakeholders and defining boundaries. The main lessons from our participatory systems approach are: flexibility is needed to realise stakeholder participation; balance research with practice; ensure adequate research capacity; define the roles of stakeholders and explore system boundaries continuously. The implementation of these lessons is supported by a reflection and learning culture. These lessons are relevant for practitioners, researchers, policymakers and citizens in effectively planning, implementing and evaluating health promotion programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wagemakers, Annemarie & Elkhuizen, Samantha & Bindels, Anner & Wachter, Marte & Niewold, Dagmar & Derkzen, Marthe & Thompson, Kristina, 2025. "A participatory systems approach in community health promotion: Lessons learnt from an overall evaluation of a program to reduce health inequities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001624
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001624
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braveman, P.A. & Kumanyika, S. & Fielding, J. & LaVeist, T. & Borrell, L.N. & Manderscheid, R. & Troutman, A., 2011. "Health disparities and health equity: The issue is justice," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(SUPPL. 1), pages 149-155.
    2. Liina Mansukoski & Bridget Lockyer & Amy Creaser & Jessica Sheringham & Laura Sheard & Philip Garnett & Tiffany Yang & Richard Cookson & Alexandra Albert & Shahid Islam & Robert Shore & Aiysha Khan & , 2023. "Meta-evaluation of a whole systems programme, ActEarly: A study protocol," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Wagemakers, Annemarie & Vaandrager, Lenneke & Koelen, Maria A. & Saan, Hans & Leeuwis, Cees, 2010. "Community health promotion: A framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 428-435, November.
    4. Therese Riley & Liza Hopkins & Maria Gomez & Seanna Davidson & Jessica Jacob, 2024. "System Action Learning: Reorientating Practice for System Change in Preventive Health," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-16, February.
    5. McGill, Elizabeth & Er, Vanessa & Penney, Tarra & Egan, Matt & White, Martin & Meier, Petra & Whitehead, Margaret & Lock, Karen & Anderson de Cuevas, Rachel & Smith, Richard & Savona, Natalie & Rutter, 2021. "Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: A research methods review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    6. Schwarzman, Joanna & Bauman, Adrian & Gabbe, Belinda J. & Rissel, Chris & Shilton, Trevor & Smith, Ben J., 2022. "How practitioner, organisational and system-level factors act to influence health promotion evaluation capacity: Validation of a conceptual framework," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Jolley, Gwyneth, 2014. "Evaluating complex community-based health promotion: Addressing the challenges," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 71-81.
    8. Lisa Wilderink & Ingrid Bakker & Albertine J. Schuit & Jacob C. Seidell & Ioana A. Pop & Carry M. Renders, 2022. "A Theoretical Perspective on Why Socioeconomic Health Inequalities Are Persistent: Building the Case for an Effective Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Therese Riley & Liza Hopkins & Maria Gomez & Seanna Davidson & Jessica Jacob, 2024. "Correction: System Action Learning: Reorientating Practice for System Change in Preventive Health," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 17-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olazabal, Veronica & Wyatt, Alyna, 2025. "Designing for sustainability: A case in corporate philanthropy and evaluative thinking," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Liu, Jiawei & Niederdeppe, Jeff, 2024. "Effects of communicating health disparities using social comparison framing: A comprehensive review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    3. Judith Muhonja Ochieng & Janice D. Crist, 2021. "“I put diabetes on the shelf†: African-American Women’s Perceptions of Risk for Diabetes Complications," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 30(7), pages 1012-1022, September.
    4. Darrell Hudson & Keon Gilbert & Melody Goodman, 2023. "Promoting Authentic Academic—Community Engagement to Advance Health Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-8, February.
    5. Tamara Power & Denise Wilson & Odette Best & Teresa Brockie & Lisa Bourque Bearskin & Eugenia Millender & John Lowe, 2020. "COVID‐19 and Indigenous Peoples: An imperative for action," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 2737-2741, August.
    6. Anand, Sudhir, 2021. "The many faces of health justice," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112537, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Evrosina I. Isaac & Andrea R. Meisman & Kirstin Drucker & Stephanie Violante & Kathryn L. Behrhorst & Alfonso Floyd & Jennifer M. Rohan, 2020. "The Relationship between Health Disparities, Psychosocial Functioning and Health Outcomes in Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplant Populations: Recommendations for Clinical Care," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-14, March.
    8. Jessica Naidu & Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci & Tanvir C. Turin, 2023. "A Critical Lens on Health: Key Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis and Its Benefits to Anti-Racism in Population Public Health Research," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-10, February.
    9. Marion Herens & Evert Jan Bakker & Johan van Ophem & Annemarie Wagemakers & Maria Koelen, 2016. "Health-Related Quality of Life, Self-Efficacy and Enjoyment Keep the Socially Vulnerable Physically Active in Community-Based Physical Activity Programs: A Sequential Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Masaya Kobayashi & Hikari Ishido & Jiro Mizushima & Hirotaka Ishikawa, 2022. "Multi-Dimensional Dynamics of Psychological Health Disparities under the COVID-19 in Japan: Fairness/Justice in Socio-Economic and Ethico-Political Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-45, December.
    11. Anna Brugulat-Panés & Lee Randall & Thiago Hérick de Sá & Megha Anil & Haowen Kwan & Lambed Tatah & James Woodcock & Ian R. Hambleton & Ebele R. I. Mogo & Lisa Micklesfield & Caitlin Pley & Ishtar Gov, 2023. "The Potential for Healthy, Sustainable, and Equitable Transport Systems in Africa and the Caribbean: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Lane, Haylee & Sarkies, Mitchell & Martin, Jennifer & Haines, Terry, 2017. "Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 11-27.
    13. Stuart B. Kamenetsky & Vanessa Chen & Eyal Heled, 2024. "Matching patients with therapists in culturally diverse rehabilitation services during civil unrest," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 407-418, September.
    14. Peigang Wang & Chunling Xu, 2015. "Research on the Comprehensive Evaluation of China’s Environmental Health, 2003–2010," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 122(3), pages 709-721, July.
    15. Kirsten Thecla Verkooijen & Sabina Super & Lisanne Sofie Mulderij & Dico de Jager & Annemarie Wagemakers, 2020. "Using Realist Interviews to Improve Theory on the Mechanisms and Outcomes of Sport for Development Programmes," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 152-161.
    16. Elisabeth Paul & Céline Deville & Oriane Bodson & N'koué Emmanuel Sambiéni & Ibrahima Thiam & Marc Bourgeois & Valéry Ridde & Fabienne Fecher, 2019. "How is equity approached in universal health coverage? An analysis of global and country policy documents in Benin and Senegal," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/298047, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    17. Viniece Jennings & April Karen Baptiste & Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Renée Skeete, 2017. "Urban Green Space and the Pursuit of Health Equity in Parts of the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Hadfield, Mark & Jopling, Michael, 2018. "Case study as a means of evaluating the impact of early years leaders: Steps, paths and routes," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 167-176.
    19. Meenakshi Richardson & Sara F. Waters, 2023. "Indigenous Voices Against Suicide: A Meta-Synthesis Advancing Prevention Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(22), pages 1-19, November.
    20. Timothy P. Holloway & Sisitha Jayasinghe & Lisa Dalton & Michelle L. Kilpatrick & Roger Hughes & Kira A. E. Patterson & Robert Soward & Kylie Burgess & Nuala M. Byrne & Andrew P. Hills & Kiran D. K. A, 2023. "Enhancing Food Literacy and Food Security through School Gardening in Rural and Regional Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-13, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.