IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v113y2025ics0149718925001454.html

The scientific discussion of stakeholder involvement in social return on investment analysis? A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Klein, Cornelia

Abstract

Stakeholder involvement is an essential part of conducting social return on investment evaluations (SROI). This systematic literature review takes stock of the scholarly discussion of how stakeholders are defined, identified, and involved during SROI evaluations, including the involvement of vulnerable groups as key stakeholders of evaluated projects or organisations in the social sector. The author searched three databases Google Scholar, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed articles published in English between 1996 and 2022, where the term ‘Social Return on Investment’ or the abbreviation ‘SROI’ was found in titles, abstracts or author keywords and also in the main text. All articles that used the phrase or abbreviation in the sense of the SROI framework and discussed any of its aspects were included in the review. Articles solely focusing on the results of a conducted SROI evaluation were excluded, while case studies discussing the application of the SROI framework were included. As a result, 101 peer-reviewed articles published between 2004 and 2022 were found to meet the inclusion criteria for the review. Qualitative data analysis with MAXQDA revealed strong agreement on the definition of stakeholders and underline prior findings of inconsistencies in choosing and involving stakeholders. The review further uncovers strategies and methods applicable for future evaluations, which also enable the successful involvement of vulnerable groups. These findings address critical issues of the SROI framework that contribute to furthering the scholarly debate and may even enhance the approaches to involving stakeholders in social impact evaluations in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Klein, Cornelia, 2025. "The scientific discussion of stakeholder involvement in social return on investment analysis? A systematic literature review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001454
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001454
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unggul Purwohedi & Bruce Gurd, 2019. "Using Social Return on Investment (SROI) to measure project impact in local government," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 56-63, January.
    2. Hall, Matthew & Millo, Yuval & Barman, E, 2015. "Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62354, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Katherine Ruff, 2021. "How impact measurement devices act: the performativity of theory of change, SROI and dashboards," Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(3), pages 332-360, January.
    4. Gargani, John, 2017. "The leap from ROI to SROI: Farther than expected?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 116-126.
    5. Matthew Hall & Yuval Millo & Emily Barman, 2015. "Who and What Really Counts? Stakeholder Prioritization and Accounting for Social Value," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(7), pages 907-934, November.
    6. Teresa Savall Morera & Carmen Guzmán & Francisco J. Santos, 2022. "Measuring the impact of sheltered workshops through the SROI: A case analysis in southern Spain," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(2), pages 381-415, June.
    7. Matthew J Page & Joanne E McKenzie & Patrick M Bossuyt & Isabelle Boutron & Tammy C Hoffmann & Cynthia D Mulrow & Larissa Shamseer & Jennifer M Tetzlaff & Elie A Akl & Sue E Brennan & Roger Chou & Jul, 2021. "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano & Pilar Tirado-Valencia & Antonio Sianes & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez & Mª Carmen López-Martín, 2020. "SROI Methodology for Public Administration Decisions about Financing with Social Criteria. A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    9. Nicholls, Jeremy, 2017. "Social return on investment—Development and convergence," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 127-135.
    10. Bellucci, Marco & Biggeri, Mario & Nitti, Carmela & Terenzi, Linda, 2023. "Accounting for disability and work inclusion in tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    11. Rob Vluggen & Relus Kuijpers & Janjaap Semeijn & Cees J. Gelderman, 2020. "Social return on investment in the public sector," Journal of Public Procurement, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(3), pages 235-264, April.
    12. Antonio Ariza-Montes & Antonio Sianes & Vicente Fernández-Rodríguez & Carmen López-Martín & Mercedes Ruíz-Lozano & Pilar Tirado-Valencia, 2021. "Social Return on Investment (SROI) to Assess the Impacts of Tourism: A Case Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    13. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Marco Mastrodascio & Denita Cepiku, 2022. "The social return on investment model: a systematic literature review," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(7), pages 49-86, March.
    14. Cavicchi, Caterina & Vagnoni, Emidia, 2023. "Digital information systems in support of accountability: The case of a welfare provision non-governmental organisation," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(5).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:12:p:1742-1758 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Begoña Gutiérrez-Nieto & Juan Camón-Cala & Beatriz Cuéllar-Fernández & Yolanda Fuertes-Callén, 2025. "A bibliometric analysis of the social return on investment," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Marques, Susana Ramalho & Rodrigues, Ricardo & Zerth, Jürgen & Orrego, Carola, 2025. "The use of social return on investment approaches to evaluate integrated long-term care in high-income countries: A scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. José Pablo Abeal Vázquez & Pilar Tirado-Valencia & Mercedes Ruiz-Lozano, 2021. "The Impact and Value of a Tourism Product: A Hybrid Sustainability Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Nicolas Scelles & Yuhei Inoue & Seth Joseph Perkin & Maurizio Valenti, 2025. "Social Impact Assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives: Evaluating the Social Return on Investment of an Inclusion Offer," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(3), pages 613-629, March.
    5. Hannah Charlotte Joos, 2019. "Influences on managerial perceptions of stakeholder salience: two decades of research in review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 3-37, February.
    6. Renato Camodeca & Alex Almici & Umberto Sagliaschi, 2018. "Sustainability Disclosure in Integrated Reporting: Does It Matter to Investors? A Cheap Talk Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-34, November.
    7. Tian, Haowen & Wang, Junkai & Wu, Sirui, 2024. "Beyond the target: The spillover effect of shareholder activism on corporate tax avoidance," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Mitchell, J. Robert & Israelsen, Trevor L. & Mitchell, Ronald K. & Lim, Dominic S.K., 2021. "Stakeholder identification as entrepreneurial action: The social process of stakeholder enrollment in new venture emergence," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(6).
    9. Ingo Pies & Philipp Schreck & Karl Homann, 2021. "Single-objective versus multi-objective theories of the firm: using a constitutional perspective to resolve an old debate," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 779-811, April.
    10. Julien Kleszczowski, 2016. "La place des parties prenantes dans l’évaluation de l’impact social des organisations non lucratives: étude empirique au sein d’une organisation française," Post-Print hal-01901230, HAL.
    11. Natapol Thongplew & Jariyaporn Onwong & Kasin Ransikarbum & Ratchawut Kotlakome, 2025. "Mainstreaming local organic foods: organic food provision in a fresh market to promote organic production–consumption system in emerging economy," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(12), pages 28847-28871, December.
    12. Hall, Matthew & O'Dwyer, Brendan, 2017. "Accounting, non-governmental organizations and civil society: The importance of nonprofit organizations to understanding accounting, organizations and society," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-5.
    13. Valentinov, Vladislav & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2021. "Social capital in cooperatives: An evolutionary Luhmannian perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(4), pages 1317-1331.
    14. Chernyi, Alex & Uotila, Juha, 2024. "Prioritization of organizational stakeholders: A managerial decision-making perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    15. Clare, Grace & Diprose, Gradon & Lee, Louise & Bremer, Phil & Skeaff, Sheila & Mirosa, Miranda, 2023. "Measuring the impact of food rescue: A social return on investment analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Vladislav Valentinov & Constantine Iliopoulos, 2021. "Social capital in cooperatives: an evolutionary Luhmannian perspective," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1317-1331, September.
    17. Marcelo F. Cruz Jara & Jelena Spanjol, 2025. "Understanding Multiple Perspectives on Social Value in Business: An Integrative Review and Typology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 407-435, May.
    18. Maria Federica Izzo & Alberto Dello Strologo & Fabrizio Granà, 2020. "Learning from the Best: New Challenges and Trends in IR Reporters’ Disclosure and the Role of SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-22, July.
    19. Spanò, Rosanna & Grossi, Giuseppe & Landi, Giovanni Catello, 2022. "Academic entrepreneurial hybrids: Accounting and accountability in the case of MegaRide," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(5).
    20. Guillaume Plaisance, 2023. "Governing a union's external stakeholders: A prioritization method based on relationship quality and perceived impact," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(1), pages 75-108, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.