IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v113y2025ics0149718925001454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The scientific discussion of stakeholder involvement in social return on investment analysis? A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Klein, Cornelia

Abstract

Stakeholder involvement is an essential part of conducting social return on investment evaluations (SROI). This systematic literature review takes stock of the scholarly discussion of how stakeholders are defined, identified, and involved during SROI evaluations, including the involvement of vulnerable groups as key stakeholders of evaluated projects or organisations in the social sector. The author searched three databases Google Scholar, SCOPUS, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed articles published in English between 1996 and 2022, where the term ‘Social Return on Investment’ or the abbreviation ‘SROI’ was found in titles, abstracts or author keywords and also in the main text. All articles that used the phrase or abbreviation in the sense of the SROI framework and discussed any of its aspects were included in the review. Articles solely focusing on the results of a conducted SROI evaluation were excluded, while case studies discussing the application of the SROI framework were included. As a result, 101 peer-reviewed articles published between 2004 and 2022 were found to meet the inclusion criteria for the review. Qualitative data analysis with MAXQDA revealed strong agreement on the definition of stakeholders and underline prior findings of inconsistencies in choosing and involving stakeholders. The review further uncovers strategies and methods applicable for future evaluations, which also enable the successful involvement of vulnerable groups. These findings address critical issues of the SROI framework that contribute to furthering the scholarly debate and may even enhance the approaches to involving stakeholders in social impact evaluations in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Klein, Cornelia, 2025. "The scientific discussion of stakeholder involvement in social return on investment analysis? A systematic literature review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001454
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001454
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.