IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v113y2025ics0149718925001399.html

Building capacity for health research in higher education: Evaluating readiness for research and scholarship

Author

Listed:
  • Laurila, Kelly A.
  • Sanderson, Katharine
  • Lane, Taylor S.
  • Stearns, Diane
  • Tabor, Derrick C.
  • Baldwin, Julie A.

Abstract

This case study examines key components of research readiness for Doctoral Universities with High Research Activity (R2) through the lens of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program. While there are long-standing systems in place for ranking research institutions based on grant expenditures, there is a need to establish methods to evaluate institutions’ readiness for externally funded competitive research. Drawing on literature across multiple disciplines and framed in alignment with the RCMI program goals, the authors developed a multidimensional instrument to examine research readiness centered on two primary domains (investigator and institutional readiness). The largest barriers to proposal development and conducting research/scholarship projects were managing time for competing expectations including scholarship, teaching, mentoring students, and service and recruiting skilled students who are prepared to assist the research process (respectively). Building research capacity requires research infrastructure, equitable distribution of institutional and grant resources, protected time for research, and focused areas research. Findings inform evaluation methods to assess research readiness, identify indicators and set benchmarks to measure changes in capacity and offer strategies for universities to enhance research capacity-building efforts and optimize institutions’ ability to conduct NIH mission relevant research.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurila, Kelly A. & Sanderson, Katharine & Lane, Taylor S. & Stearns, Diane & Tabor, Derrick C. & Baldwin, Julie A., 2025. "Building capacity for health research in higher education: Evaluating readiness for research and scholarship," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001399
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001399
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102672?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lynda B. Ransdell & Taylor S. Lane & Anna L. Schwartz & Heidi A. Wayment & Julie A. Baldwin, 2021. "Mentoring New and Early-Stage Investigators and Underrepresented Minority Faculty for Research Success in Health-Related Fields: An Integrative Literature Review (2010–2020)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-35, January.
    2. Trotter II, Robert T. & Laurila, Kelly & Alberts, David & Huenneke, Laura F., 2015. "A diagnostic evaluation model for complex research partnerships with community engagement: The partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention (NACP) model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 10-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohamed Mubasher & Thomas Pearson & Muhammed Y. Idris & Kimberly Lawson & Jada Holmes & Priscilla Pemu & Adriana Baez & Jonathan K. Stiles & Maritza S. Salazar & Winston E. Thompson & Alexander Quarsh, 2023. "The Role of Mock Reviewing Sessions in the National Research Mentoring Network Strategic Empowerment Tailored for Health Equity Investigators: A Randomized Controlled Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(9), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Collins, Cyleste C. & Rizkallah, Mona Shediac & Dolata, Jacqueline & Nonguierma, Elodie & Hood, Erika & Thornton, J. Daryl & Sehgal, Ashwini, 2025. "Building the capacity of early-stage investigators to conduct community-engaged health disparities research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    3. Mohamed Mubasher & Kimberly Lawson & Priscilla Pemu & Thomas Pearson & Jeffrey Engler & Adriana Baez & Jonathan K. Stiles & Maritza S. Salazar & Lee S. Caplan & Keith Green & Meldra Hall & Muhammed Y., 2021. "Randomized Controlled Study to Test the Effectiveness of Developmental Network Coaching in the Career Advancement of Diverse Early-Stage Investigators (ESIs): Implementation Challenges and Lessons Learned," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Richard Yanagihara & Marla J. Berry & Monica J. Carson & Sandra P. Chang & Heather Corliss & Marc B. Cox & Georges Haddad & Christine Hohmann & Scott T. Kelley & Eun Sook Yu Lee & Bruce G. Link & Rich, 2021. "Building a Diverse Workforce and Thinkforce to Reduce Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Anastasia Rogova & Isabel Martinez Leal & Maggie Britton & Shine Chang & Kamisha H. Escoto & Kayce D. Solari Williams & Crystal Roberson & Lorna H. McNeill & Lorraine R. Reitzel, 2022. "Promoting Cancer Health Equity: A Qualitative Study of Mentee and Mentor Perspectives of a Training Program for Underrepresented Scholars in Cancer Health Disparities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Angela Sy & Traci Hayes & Kelly Laurila & Carlamarie Noboa & Robbert J. Langwerden & Michelle M. Hospital & Doris A. Andújar-Pérez & Lakesha Stevenson & Suzanne M. Randolph Cunningham & Latrice Rollin, 2020. "Evaluating Research Centers in Minority Institutions: Framework, Metrics, Best Practices, and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. AJ Alvero & Courtney Peña & Amber R. Moore & Leslie Luqueño & Cisco B. Barron & Latishya Steele & Stevie Eberle & Crystal M. Botham, 2024. "Time to Degree, Identity, and Grant Writing: Lessons Learned From a Mixed-Methods Longitudinal Case Study of Biosciences PhD Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    8. Jae M. Sevelius & Orlando O. Harris & Lisa Bowleg, 2024. "Intersectional Mentorship in Academic Medicine: A Conceptual Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-11, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:113:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.