Author
Listed:
- Mehari, Krista R.
- Smith, Phillip N.
- Im, Angie
- Stevens, L. Taylor
- Florez, Natalie A.
- Bhatt, Vishva
- Louissaint, Nicolette A.
Abstract
Human ecosystem disruptions such as Covid-19 and natural disasters increase existing health disparities among communities that have been historically underserved by healthcare systems, especially communities of color. Community-based organizations (CBOs) are well-placed to mobilize effective responses to local needs, which may mitigate the impact of human ecosystem disruptions on disparities. The purpose of this study was to explore CBO leaders’ perspectives on responding to community needs during human ecosystem disruptions, with the goal of informing entities that plan to support or partner with CBOs to maximize the effectiveness of disaster responding. Interview respondents were 31 adults with roles in human-serving organizations across two cities in disaster-prone regions and with populations that score highly across several indices for social vulnerability. Barriers that CBOs encountered included bureaucracy and procedural obstacles, lack of awareness of the work and resources of other organizations, and reduced operational capacity due to Covid-19. Strategies to support CBOs included increased funding and enhanced networking with other organizations. To mitigate the disparate impacts of human ecosystem disruptions, public and private funders should increase flexibility in funding to rapidly respond to emerging needs, and community agencies and institutions should proactively collaborate to build cross-agency infrastructure for communication, sharing resources, and referrals.
Suggested Citation
Mehari, Krista R. & Smith, Phillip N. & Im, Angie & Stevens, L. Taylor & Florez, Natalie A. & Bhatt, Vishva & Louissaint, Nicolette A., 2025.
"Mobilization of community-based organizations during Covid-19: Perceptions of barriers and needed supports,"
Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001326
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102665
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.