IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v112y2025ics014971892500120x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engaging in a Research-Practice Partnership: Insights from a North Carolina state agency

Author

Listed:
  • Bullock, Aneika
  • Smail, Emily J.

Abstract

Research-Practice Partnerships (RPPs) have recently grown in popularity as they provide a formal framework for collaborative research between researchers and practitioners. Moreover, there is a plethora of guidance for executing effective RPPs. However, there is a continuing question of whether partnerships are practical and useful; thus, our study poses the following research question: Does a grant-based RPP evaluating educational outcomes, with constituents of various governmental entities, facilitate positive outcomes for practitioners? Researchers performed an inductive thematic analysis using data from a sample of five individuals at a state agency. The researchers then used deductive methods to align themes with Henrick’s Five Dimensions of Effectiveness and, in this paper, described the three deemed most relevant to practitioner knowledge and capacity building to answer the proposed question. Findings suggest that positive benefits of participation to practitioners include programmatic insights, dissemination tools, and increased comfort with research. However, the findings also highlighted challenges to practitioners, such as using the findings to inform policy and practice and meeting added time demands of this partnership. Results of this analysis can inform other educational institutions and state agencies looking to build effective RPPs.

Suggested Citation

  • Bullock, Aneika & Smail, Emily J., 2025. "Engaging in a Research-Practice Partnership: Insights from a North Carolina state agency," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s014971892500120x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102653
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014971892500120X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102653?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s014971892500120x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.