IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v112y2025ics0149718925001156.html

Approaches to incorporating equity into program evaluation: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Faruquzzaman, Oeishi
  • Tse, Samson
  • Cameron, Ruth
  • Chee, Kenny
  • Kirst, Maritt
  • Wilson, Ciann

Abstract

Recognizing the ways in which traditional program evaluation approaches can perpetuate and reinforce systemic oppression, the field of program evaluation is at a crossroads. There is a newfound focus on promoting and advancing social justice and equity in the field of program evaluation. There are various fields of evaluation that have a focus on equity, with some types of evaluation such as decolonial and culturally responsive evaluation having been well established and new approaches such as equitable evaluation. The present scoping review sought to create a snapshot of existing equitable evaluation and other evaluation approach literature that seek to advance equity in process and/or outcome. A scoping review of English academic and grey literature (N = 42) of equity-focused or promoting evaluation frameworks such as equitable evaluation, culturally responsive, anti-racist, decolonial, and Indigenous evaluation was conducted. After reviewing the literature, we identified seven common themes for advancing equity in evaluation: a consideration of context, engaging with program partners, adapting traditional evaluation instruments and methods, utilizing a strengths-based focus, engaging in self-reflection and self-learning, shifting/addressing power imbalances, and the use of participatory methods. Identified themes can act as guiding principles, with which to advance equity-focused evaluation practices. Implications and future directions in promoting social justice in the field of program evaluation are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Faruquzzaman, Oeishi & Tse, Samson & Cameron, Ruth & Chee, Kenny & Kirst, Maritt & Wilson, Ciann, 2025. "Approaches to incorporating equity into program evaluation: A scoping review," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001156
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925001156
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102648?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ward, Melanie & Schulz, Amy J. & Israel, Barbara A. & Rice, Kristina & Martenies, Sheena E. & Markarian, Evan, 2018. "A conceptual framework for evaluating health equity promotion within community-based participatory research partnerships," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 25-34.
    2. Boyce, Ayesha S., 2017. "Lessons learned using a values-engaged approach to attend to culture, diversity, and equity in a STEM program evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 33-43.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teasdale, Rebecca M. & Strasser, Mikayla & Moore, Ceily & Graham, Kara E., 2023. "Evaluative criteria in practice: Findings from an analysis of evaluations published in Evaluation and Program Planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Saenz, Cesar, 2021. "Community partnership and ownership as key factors of community strategies. A Peruvian case study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    3. Vanessa Amos & Virginia LeBaron & Tuyet Chuong & Catherine E Elmore & Pawan Kumar Hamal & Bishnu D Paudel & Amber Steen & Sandhya Chapagain, 2023. "Co-constructing collaboration: An evidence-based approach to advance and evaluate equitable global public health research partnerships," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(10), pages 1-23, October.
    4. Izabela Simon Rampasso & Rodnei Bertazzoli & Thais Dibbern & Milena Pavan Serafim & Walter Leal Filho & Carolina Rojas-Córdova & Rosley Anholon, 2022. "Evaluating Research Partnerships through ISO 56003 Guidelines, RRI Concepts, and Ex Post Facto Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-10, April.
    5. Bisola Beatrice Oguejiofor & Ngozi Samuel Uzougbo & Abosede Olusade Kolade & Ahmed Raji & Chibuike Daraojimba, 2023. "Review of Successful Global Public-Private Partnerships: Extracting key Strategies for Effective U.S. Financial Collaborations," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 10(8), pages 312-331, August.
    6. Boyce, Ayesha S. & Avent, Cherie & Adetogun, Adeyemo & Servance, Lakeita & DeStefano, Lizanne & Nerem, Robert & Platt, Manu O., 2019. "Implementation and evaluation of a biotechnology research experience for African-American high school students," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 162-169.
    7. Haynes, Emma & Marawili, Minitja & Marika, Brendan Makungun & Mitchell, Alice G. & Phillips, Jodi & Bessarab, Dawn & Walker, Roz & Cook, Jeff & Ralph, Anna P., 2019. "Community-based participatory action research on rheumatic heart disease in an Australian Aboriginal homeland: Evaluation of the ‘On track watch’ project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 38-53.
    8. Hjelm, Linnea L. & Francis, Carolee Dodge & Bareng-Antolin, Noehealani, 2025. "An evaluation of a 9th and 10th grade Native American virtual pilot: Utilizing a culturally responsive and Inclusive Science model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Gates, Emily F. & Madres, Joseph & Hall, Jori N. & Alvarez, Kayla Benitez, 2022. "It takes an ecosystem: Socioecological factors influencing equity-oriented evaluation in New England, U.S., 2021," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Avent, Cherie M., 2025. "The criticality of language: Exploring STEM education evaluators conceptualizations of equity, diversity, and inclusion and the influence on their roles and practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    11. Collins, Cyleste C. & Rizkallah, Mona Shediac & Dolata, Jacqueline & Nonguierma, Elodie & Hood, Erika & Thornton, J. Daryl & Sehgal, Ashwini, 2025. "Building the capacity of early-stage investigators to conduct community-engaged health disparities research," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    12. Lisa J. Hardy & Kevin Shaw & Amy Hughes & Elizabeth Hulen & Priscilla R. Sanderson & Candi Corrales & Travis Pinn & Jamie Esplain & R. Cruz Begay, 2020. "Building a Narrative of Equity: Weaving Indigenous Approaches into Community-Engaged Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-9, July.
    13. Antonio Sianes & Rocío Vela-Jiménez, 2020. "Can Differing Opinions Hinder Partnerships for the Localization of the Sustainable Development Goals? Evidence from Marginalized Urban Areas in Andalusia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.