Author
Listed:
- O’Neal, Catherine Walker
- Lucier-Greer, Mallory
- Richardson, Evin W.
- Miranda, Haley E.
- Tate, Allan
- McKay, Brian K.
Abstract
Federal policy mandates that United States military members receive numerous financial trainings across their career to improve their financial literacy and equip them to make informed financial decisions that, ultimately, promote positive individual and family well-being. Connected to this mandate, systematic evaluation efforts of the Department of the Air Force’s Personal Financial Readiness program were initiated to identify program outcomes and downstream results while simultaneously informing program improvements and modifications. When situated in a discussion of evaluation theory and design practices, documenting these outcome and process evaluation protocols can provide valuable insight for scientist-practitioners designing multi-site program evaluations in the context of real-world constraints, as is often the case for large institutions, including the military. The evaluation design includes a prospective cohort design for the outcome evaluation with surveys completed before and after training and 3- and 6-months following training. The surveys provide data on short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes. Data collected for the process evaluation, include targeted surveys and interviews with individuals conducting and participating in the training. Together, this protocol illustrates a theory-informed evaluation design of a complex, multi-site set of trainings utilizing diverse data collection methods to conduct a rigorous outcome and process evaluation.
Suggested Citation
O’Neal, Catherine Walker & Lucier-Greer, Mallory & Richardson, Evin W. & Miranda, Haley E. & Tate, Allan & McKay, Brian K., 2025.
"Protocol for the pragmatic evaluation of the Department of the Air Force’s Personal Financial Readiness Program,"
Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001120
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102645
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:112:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925001120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.