IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v111y2025ics0149718925000692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on evaluation model for virtual experiment teaching based on interval-valued fuzzy sets

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Qi
  • Zhong, Wei

Abstract

The evaluation of virtual experiment teaching (VET) is a fuzzy assessment problem involving multiple indicators, multiple levels, and interval values, inherently characterized by uncertainties that make accurate evaluation challenging. Interval-valued fuzzy sets (IVFSs) can effectively reduce the loss of fuzzy information during data processing. Based on an analysis of the VET evaluation index system, this study proposes an interval-valued fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (IVFCE) model. It employs interval-valued fuzzy set theory to conduct a multi-level comprehensive evaluation of virtual experiment teaching while validating the results using traditional fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The derived results prove more convincing, facilitate stakeholders' understanding of evaluation criteria and improvement directions, better reflect the diversity and complexity inherent in VET evaluations, and ultimately promote continuous quality enhancement in virtual experiment pedagogy.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Qi & Zhong, Wei, 2025. "Research on evaluation model for virtual experiment teaching based on interval-valued fuzzy sets," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000692
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000692
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102602?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:111:y:2025:i:c:s0149718925000692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.