Author
Listed:
- Ali, Bina
- Shamblen, Steve
- Scarbrough, William
- Atwood, Katharine
- Sangpukdee, Ua-aree
- Andrews, Elise
- Markowitz, Jan
- Wensel, Amanda
Abstract
Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers are on the frontlines of the opioid response. This study explored the EMS training needs in Baltimore County, Maryland. An online survey conducted between January-June 2021 assessed knowledge, attitudes, awareness, and self-efficacy to use opioid overdose prevention strategies; burnout, compassion fatigue, stress, and wellness; and training needs among EMS providers (N = 256). Participants reported positive attitudes toward the use of opioid treatment guidelines and confidence in their ability to use the guidelines. They indicated positive attitudes toward harm reduction, but less favorable attitudes toward opioid use disorder (OUD). Although the participants understood the role of a peer recovery specialist moderately well, they were not fully comfortable with making a referral. They reported relatively low levels of burnout and compassion fatigue and good wellness practices, but indicated a moderate level of stress associated with COVID-19. Perceived training needs included: lifetime fitness and wellness, trauma-informed care, stigma awareness, stages of change, and harm reduction. Offering these trainings and enhancing EMS providers’ comfort to make referrals to peer recovery support services may strengthen the referral systems and connect overdose survivors to a continuum of care.
Suggested Citation
Ali, Bina & Shamblen, Steve & Scarbrough, William & Atwood, Katharine & Sangpukdee, Ua-aree & Andrews, Elise & Markowitz, Jan & Wensel, Amanda, 2023.
"Opioid overdose prevention training needs: Findings from emergency medical services providers in Baltimore County, Maryland,"
Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:epplan:v:101:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923001301
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102353
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:101:y:2023:i:c:s0149718923001301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.