IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enscpo/v67y2017icp16-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing successful implementation of Biosphere Reserves in Vietnam: Challenges, opportunities and lessons learnt

Author

Listed:
  • Cuong, Chu Van
  • Dart, Peter
  • Dudley, Nigel
  • Hockings, Marc

Abstract

The way biosphere reserve principles are applied in Vietnam was assessed through analysis of legal documents and an online survey with 41 managers and staff members of the Biosphere Reserve Management Boards and National Man and the Biosphere Committee. The significant growth of the biosphere reserve network in Vietnam since 2000 is indicative of strong support from the National MAB Committee and the local provincial authorities in particular. Although all biosphere reserves conform to the Biosphere Reserve conceptual model, the operation and management effectiveness of sites is hindered by the predominant practice of sectoral and top-down control that is at odds with the intent of biosphere reserve management. The relatively weak legal status of biosphere reserves within the national framework is counter balanced by their more direct management by, and support from the autonomous provincial and city authorities. Recent administrative decentralisation in Vietnam allows the local authority flexibility in interpreting the central policies and regulations so as to benefit biosphere reserve management. Future sustainability and effectiveness of the biosphere reserves will depend on the implementation of appropriate, locally-based management solutions. This will require stronger support and commitment of the provincial leaders, relevant sectoral actors and communities to ensure cross-sectoral participation and collaboration, and secure adequate resourcing of biosphere reserve management activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Cuong, Chu Van & Dart, Peter & Dudley, Nigel & Hockings, Marc, 2017. "Factors influencing successful implementation of Biosphere Reserves in Vietnam: Challenges, opportunities and lessons learnt," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 16-26.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:67:y:2017:i:c:p:16-26
    DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901116303847
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Haoqi & Li, Weide & Lv, Guanghui, 2019. "How nonrandom habitat loss affects nature reserve planning strategies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 39-46.
    2. Sagie, Hila & Orenstein, Daniel E., 2022. "Benefits of Stakeholder integration in an ecosystem services assessment of Mount Carmel Biosphere Reserve, Israel," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    3. Ana Filipa Ferreira & Heike Zimmermann & Rui Santos & Henrik von Wehrden, 2020. "Biosphere Reserves’ Management Effectiveness—A Systematic Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-32, July.
    4. Liu, Haoqi & Li, Weide & Lv, Guanghui, 2017. "The design of nature reserves in the face of habitat loss," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 358(C), pages 50-58.
    5. Pool-Stanvliet, Ruida & Stoll-Kleemann, Susanne & Giliomee, Jan H., 2018. "Criteria for selection and evaluation of biosphere reserves in support of the UNESCO MAB programme in South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 654-663.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enscpo:v:67:y:2017:i:c:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/environmental-science-and-policy/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.