IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v8y1983i8p731-736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New problems do not demand new solutions: The principle of least disruption

Author

Listed:
  • Lave, Charles A.

Abstract

The conference has highlighted the alternative responses to energy and other resource supply disruptions: the laissez faire or free market approach vs. that of command and control government intervention. Economists at the conference tended to defend the virtues of the market response; administrators tended to defend centralized government decision making. This paper argues that the correct response is to minimize disruption in existing institutional arrangements: that existing mechanisms and institutions tend to work better in new situations than do new mechanisms and institutional arrangements. Thus the reason command and control regulation tends to fail in emergencies is that it requires consumers and producers to depart from their normal patterns of behavior. The Federal Aviation Administration overcame the effects of the air traffic controllers' strike not by optimally rescheduling all flights, but by maintaining the old schedules to the maximum possible degree and allowing customary pilot and airline behaviour to play a major role. The free market, however, is not without limitations. Certain goods and services are not ordinarily subject to price and cannot be allocated by the market; uncompensated price increases and accompanying redistributions of wealth in disruption episodes may not be acceptable to the majority of people.

Suggested Citation

  • Lave, Charles A., 1983. "New problems do not demand new solutions: The principle of least disruption," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 8(8), pages 731-736.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:8:y:1983:i:8:p:731-736
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(83)90045-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544283900452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(83)90045-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:8:y:1983:i:8:p:731-736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.