Author
Listed:
- Bach, Wilfrid
- Matthews, William H.
Abstract
One major message of this paper, and of this Conference for that matter, is that it is essential to widen our agendas so that all possible alternative energy strategies can be explored. In any case, over the next 50 years or so several tens of terawatts of power have to be supplied, whether we consider a high-energy or a low-energy demand scenario. This is a formidable task that requires the development of all potential energy resources at small scales and large scales, and as decentralized and centralized units. Thus, the major task ahead is to determine the “best” mix of energy resources that makes economic sense whilst guaranteeing a livable environment. With the proper support, the solar-based renewable energy resources could play an important role in the transition from a consumptive to an endowment energy economy. A global installed capacity between 10 and 20 TW by 2030, and even an all-solar energy economy by the end of the next century, are considered definite possibilities. The pursuit of an energy path of such magnitude is subject to severe constraints. Beside the technological and economic questions, future energy strategies must, more than in the past, address themselves to the societal, political, institutional, resource base, environmental and other sectoral issues, including those of food, health, urbanization, and industrialization. The agenda for the energy debate must further include such vital issues as time frames and implications for future generations; international relations and questions of interdependence; North-South equity and vulnerability; cost-benefit and risk-benefit analyses; issues of centralization and decentralization; and questions of lifestyles and progress. Virtually all of these issues of the ongoing energy debate are controversial, making a choice difficult. The difficulty is compounded by the fact that the key ingredients of choice—prudence and wisdom—cannot be treated in a rigorously scientific manner. In such a state of uncertainty, it seems prudent to adopt a flexible energy strategy that can accommodate as many energy options at as many scales as practical.
Suggested Citation
Bach, Wilfrid & Matthews, William H., 1979.
"Exploring alternative energy strategies,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 4(5), pages 711-722.
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:4:y:1979:i:5:p:711-722
DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(79)90005-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:4:y:1979:i:5:p:711-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.