IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v3y1978i6p785-797.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision analysis of the oil blowout at Bravo platform

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, David W.

Abstract

The oil blowout problem has received increasing attention as the search for oil has been carried further offshore. Most scientific effort has been on the prevention side via predictions of blowouts and changes in design of the platforms. Few studies have focussed on oil blowouts once they have occurred. This paper is a case study of the oil blowout that occurred on the Bravo platform in the Ekofisk field in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea. The primary data included interviews with the group who directed the Norwegian government response to this blowout. Other data came from preliminary reports made available soon after the incident. The paper describes the physical aspects of the blowout and the existing principles that guided the initial responses from Phillips Petroleum in Norway. These principles are subjected to a critique prior to the description and structuring of the alternatives facing Phillips and Norway as they responded to this crisis. The government actors involved in the blowout response and their roles are also briefly described. Finally, the decisions made by the Norwegian Action Group are classified and described. Following this effort, a qualitative evaluation is offered of these decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, David W., 1978. "A decision analysis of the oil blowout at Bravo platform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 3(6), pages 785-797.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:3:y:1978:i:6:p:785-797
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(78)90045-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544278900452
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(78)90045-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:3:y:1978:i:6:p:785-797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.