Author
Listed:
- Gao, Wenfang
- Wang, Junpu
- Zhan, Donghao
- Wang, Yanan
- Wang, Jiaqing
- Tan, Yue
- Yan, Kai
- He, Jialei
- Zhang, Xueqiang
Abstract
Under the dual pressure of environmental compliance and cost control, green methanol synthesis is crucial for achieving high methanol production efficiency and reducing pollution. However, carbon emissions or economic performance have been mainly evaluated separately, with only a limited number of studies conducting integrated assessments that consider life cycle burdens, process-specific pollutants, and operating costs. In this study, a comprehensive assessment was conducted for typical methanol synthesis processes, based on life cycle assessment, comprehensive environmental assessment, and operating cost assessment. Three methanol synthesis processes were selected under a cradle-to-gate boundary using a functional unit of 1 t of methanol, these methods were distinguished by their feedstocks (i.e., coal-based methanol (P1), CO2 and electrolytic hydrogen-based methanol (P2), and coke oven gas-based methanol (P3)). Environmental assessment demonstrated that P2 exhibited the lowest overall impact, with a lower global warming potential (0.47 t CO2-eq) than P1 (3.69 t CO2-eq) and P3 (1.87 t CO2-eq). Economic assessment revealed that the total operating costs of P1 and P3 were considerably higher than those of P2 in terms of chemicals and energy. The highest comprehensive evaluation index was achieved by P2, which was attributed to superior environmental performance resulting from (a) the use of green energy and low-pollution feedstocks and (b) reasonable operating costs. This study provides a reproducible multidimensional framework for selecting and optimizing sustainable methanol synthesis processes.
Suggested Citation
Gao, Wenfang & Wang, Junpu & Zhan, Donghao & Wang, Yanan & Wang, Jiaqing & Tan, Yue & Yan, Kai & He, Jialei & Zhang, Xueqiang, 2026.
"Comprehensive environmental and operating cost assessment of typical methanol synthesis processes under a cradle-to-gate boundary,"
Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226020323
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.141925
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:360:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226020323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.